this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2025
189 points (88.0% liked)

History Memes

3426 readers
1438 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism, atrocity denial or apologia, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Lemmy.world rules.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OboTheHobo@ttrpg.network 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

On a global scale, I think there's an argument to be made that the fight never ended at all.

But, on a local scale, Chile comes to mind. Pinochet was ousted democratically and the military dictatorship ended. But that was only really because Pinochet was willing to relinquish control (due to external factors mostly, not just some change of heart) which isn't exactly common for fascist and authoritarian leaders, so Im not sure if that example applies much generally.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It would probably be more accurate to say that Pinochet realized he did not have the requisite violence to crush the popular support arrayed against him - the military refused to back his proposal to hold onto power after losing the election, so he stepped down in the hopes (sadly successful) of avoiding a noose for his crimes against Chile.

Institutions - and popular support - matter even when violence is involved, or implicitly threatened.

[–] OboTheHobo@ttrpg.network 3 points 2 days ago

True, that is a better way of putting it