this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2025
59 points (100.0% liked)

Hacker News

2640 readers
348 users here now

Posts from the RSS Feed of HackerNews.

The feed sometimes contains ads and posts that have been removed by the mod team at HN.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Attempts to fix the landing gear caused the fighter jet to think it was on the ground, ultimately leading to the crash.

That sounds like really bad engineering or simply bullshit. The combined information of geolocation + altitude + motion/IMU sensors should not allow that to be possible.

[–] BluescreenOfDeath@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Sure, but who knows what shenanigans the techs and pilot were trying to convince the machine to drop the landing gear.

Under normal operations, I'd agree, but I'll bet they were putting something in a maintenance state while it was in the air, and at that point all bets are off.

Thats fair yeah.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Billions of dollars out the window with this jet. Every contractor should be held accountable for their faulty equipment the American people pay for. The F-35 development cost alone could have ended homelessness in America. But we spent all that money on a jet that isn't combat worthy?!

And one more thing. If you don't hold defense contractors accountable, they have zero interest in providing an effective machine or service.