this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2025
48 points (98.0% liked)

United Kingdom

5335 readers
256 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rah@hilariouschaos.com 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

the point was the UK is not the only one trying to do it

I don't see any evidence of the EU trying to do with the GDPR what the UK is trying to do with the Online Safety Act.

they can totally enforce the fine by restricting those businesses from doing business within their territory until they comply

That's sanctioning, not enforcing a fine.

And yes they can do that but that's not what Ofcom is talking about. Ofcom have explicitly stated that foreign citizens have "duties" under UK law. The word "duty" has a very specific meaning in English law, in fact it's really one of the most basic concepts. It means there is an obligation on someone and if that obligation is not fulfilled then courts have the power to take action.

Sanctioning a foreign citizen doesn't imply an obligation. There can't be an obligation because a foreign citizen, by definition, is not subject to English law. Ofcom is claiming that foreign citizens are subject to English law.

I don't know how you could get it more wrong.

LOL

[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah man they have an obligation(duty) to uphold British law when dealing with British citizens, how's that hard to grasp.

[–] rah@hilariouschaos.com 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

they have an obligation(duty) to uphold British law

Let me get this straight, you're claiming that non-UK citizens acting outside of the UK are subject to UK law?

how's that hard to grasp

If you are claiming what it seems like you're claiming then it's not difficult to grasp, it's just wrong.

[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

Convenient you've specifically not quoted the circumstance in which that should apply. This is companies which serve UK customers in the UK, the fact their servers are offshore and the company is offshore doesn't matter, they're doing business in the UK by being made available there and thus must be bound to those laws.