this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2025
418 points (98.8% liked)

News

32345 readers
4936 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Aug 30 (Reuters) - U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders on Saturday called on Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to resign, days after a senior public health official was fired and four others resigned in disputes over Kennedy's unorthodox opposition to vaccines.

Sanders, an independent senator from Vermont who caucuses with Democrats, wrote in a New York Times guest essay that Kennedy is "endangering the health of the American people now and into the future."

This week, Kennedy ousted the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Susan Monarez, less than a month into her tenure, deepening disarray at the nation's main public health agency. Monarez had refused to adopt new limitations on the availability of some vaccines urged by Kennedy, saying they went against scientific evidence.

Four other senior CDC officials resigned in protest, citing anti-vaccine policies and misinformation promoted by Kennedy and his team; hundreds of their colleagues walked out of the CDC's headquarters in Atlanta in support of the departing leaders.

Sanders, the ranking member of the Senate's health committee and an opponent of Kennedy's confirmation earlier this year, wrote that Kennedy ousted Monarez because she refused "to act as a rubber stamp for his dangerous policies."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ileftreddit@piefed.social 28 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I mean the fact that it’s not every single democrat in Washington demanding this tells you all you need to know

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

What would change if they all did?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Every time a Democrat is President, I get an earful about how we need 60 votes in the Senate to do anything. Currently, the Republicans have 53.

Senatorial obstruction of the rest of the Republican agenda for '25/'26 could conceivably go a long way towards removing RFK Jr.

[–] BeanGoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Barely any of this agenda is passing the legislative. It's nearly entirely executive overreach. Democrats are unwilling to do that so nothing gets done. Republicans don't care.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Barely any of this agenda is passing the legislative.

The Big Beautiful Bill reallocated trillions of dollars. Blocking that would have hampered Trump's agenda significantly, simply by depriving him of the funds to pursue it.

[–] BeanGoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 3 weeks ago

And every single Democrat in the Senate voted against it. It passed anyway.

[–] oyo@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 weeks ago

That was passed under the special rules of budget reconciliation. The Dems are shitheels but they did act pretty aggressively against the big bullshit bill (as much as they could within the "rules").

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What the hell are you talking about? He passed his entire legislative agenda with the full complicity of the Democratic leadership.

[–] oyo@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago

What kind of Fox News-equivalent bullshit reality are you living in? The Dem leadership are totally inept and feckless, but they certainly didn't vote for this shit.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yeah the comment you replied to makes no sense. Democrats have gotten their picks confirmed, everything after that is actions under the executive when it comes to RFK.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I can see how obstruction could make a difference (though not guaranteed). But not how them all saying he should be out would change anything.

[–] ileftreddit@piefed.social 4 points 3 weeks ago

Faith in the Democratic Party possibly

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

I see them as protecting their dignity by not screaming into the void. Sanders isn't accomplishing anything.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

He is a much needed voice of dissent that proves that someone, anyone, cares about what is going on. Anyone who does not speak out or act out against this is complicit, or else terrified into complacency and therefore still complicit.

Bernie can't oust RFK on his own but he can raise a banner for others to rally around and perhaps force legislative action about this. It might happen. If he stayed silent then it is guaranteed not to happen.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

A voice of dissent... in the New York Times? Few people who read the NYT are Republicans, and few of those Republicans are the sort that support Trump. Bernie is preaching to the choir here, and I don't see why you assume that people who don't preach to the choir actually don't care.

[–] ileftreddit@piefed.social 1 points 3 weeks ago

Inaction in a situation like this is complicity. To hell with dignity, these people are fucking fascists