this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2025
718 points (97.5% liked)

memes

17255 readers
4066 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

different cuts exist that already set out at least some standards for this

I don't disagree that it is difficult, but we have the ability to do this. We've done more difficult things

[โ€“] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

if companies actually did share 5 numbers with each piece of clothing (notice that that actually wouldn't work since each piece of clothing is a bit different since they're still largely hand-sown and measuring each piece of clothing is unpayably expensive) it would lead to a bureaucracy hell. businesses in europe already complain about too much bureaucracy, because they have to document a lot of things, and this would make the outcry a lot worse.

on top of that most customers wouldn't actually bother reading a datasheet of 5 numbers and instead just try them on. so it's not even a big advantage.