this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2025
753 points (97.8% liked)

Reddit

21354 readers
1972 users here now

News and Discussions about Reddit

Welcome to !reddit. This is a community for all news and discussions about Reddit.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


Rule 1- No brigading.

**You may not encourage brigading any communities or subreddits in any way. **

YSKs are about self-improvement on how to do things.



Rule 2- No illegal or NSFW or gore content.

**No illegal or NSFW or gore content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-Reddit posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

the mod said they will unban him if he remove the post in /r/viking

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

god would never allow the mass starvation of children no matter which god.

Pretty simplistic conception of god.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's the assumption that god is benevolent and would like to not murder people. Any other god doesn't deserve any admiration.

If there was nothing to tell you that those gods exist then you'd never know and wouldn't be bothered by connecting bad or good things to the existence of a god.

But as we know, Gazan people and Ukrainians are being murdered every day for ~the past 5 years. At any point of those 5 years of suffering god could have stopped it. But nah, ratchet it some more instead. and that's reason enough to not believe in a god or to even hate an asshole in power who won't move a finger to prevent suffering. And I don't need to stand on moral high ground. I think most of us could agree that feeding the hungry is the logical thing a good person would be doing at this time.

[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 days ago

That really only addresses one kind of conception of deity, namely the mono-theistic, primarily Abrahamic variations. As one alternative, if you let go of the idea that a God or Gods must be omnipotent, then things become relatively more sensible. In polytheism for example, you have deitys who are associated with all kinds of things, some that we consider positive, and others we consider negative. These kinds of models at least tend to more accurately fit the way things actually go in life - sometimes justice prevails, sometimes it doesn't.

Or as another model, there's the highly dualistic Cathars. For them there was two principles, one Good, the other Evil. Their argument was essentially that God's power was inseparable from God's nature, and thus God is incapable of doing anything that goes against their nature to do - including any harm even to evil itself. This model is very reminiscent of the kinds of criticisms people often have of those who practice strict nonviolent ideologies - that their ways and methods lack potency, or any efficacy to adequately deal with malicious forces.

Not all models even assume God is benevolent. Most Gnostic branches outright believe that the chief deity of this universe is either blind and inept at best, or outright malevolent.

At least as far as I understand some Buddhist cosmologies, the Devas, while being powerful beings roughly equivalent to most polytheistic religions, they are neither considered to be the creators of reality or the universe, nor even have complete dominion over it, or even complete knowledge of it. They are also subject to samsara just as we are, and suffering ultimately is inherently baked into reality. An interesting quirk of some Buddhist sects is the notion that even deitys from other religions can be persuaded to follow Buddha's teachings to follow the path out of suffering.

And then of course there are the pantheistic and panentheistic models, which stress the inseparability of deity and universe. The "we are God" groups. Why doesn't God end the suffering and evil in the universe? Yeah, why don't we do more?

Just wanted to give some examples to illustrate that there are a lot of religions with a lot of perspectives on what's called the problem of evil. Want to be clear that I have no interest in changing whatever your beliefs are. I just think it's boring and unfortunate that people usually only bring up the problem of evil when they're using it to criticize the easy punching bag religions.