this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2025
47 points (92.7% liked)

Asklemmy

50313 readers
650 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've been wondering about how well a lot of American states could function if they where fully independent states. I'm not thinking every state would be it's own country but states banding together and becoming there own countries. An example of this California, Oregon, and Washington.

I'm thinking that kind of like the Fediverse it is easier to manage and do more the people on a smaller scale.

What do others think of this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] monovergent@lemmy.ml 32 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

States like New York, California, etc. have been subsidizing states like West Virginia, Oklahoma, etc. for some time. If we split it up in perhaps the most likely way (along political groupings) the poorer states would not be in for a good time.

Addendum: if we were to do the split right now, we might also see the rise of a few virulently and openly fascist countries.

[โ€“] balsoft@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 days ago

Addendum: if we were to do the split right now, we might also see the rise of a few virulently and openly fascist countries

sooo the US but smaller and less powerful? sign me up