this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2025
1262 points (99.2% liked)

memes

17322 readers
1512 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can we say "commutative" in this case ?

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yeah stuff like that really ain't it. It works in a few use cases, but is objectively wrong and detracts from understanding the topic properly. That's why I teach percentages as the fractions they are. By the time you learn percentages, you already know multiplying fractions is commutative, so the trick still works, and you also understand why.

[–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 1 points 5 days ago

Yeah stuff like that really ain’t it

Yes it is

It works in a few use cases,

It works in every case where you have multiplying and dividing, including fractions and percentages

but is objectively wrong

No it isn't

detracts from understanding the topic properly

Enhances it actually

That’s why I teach percentages as the fractions they are.

Sounds like you're only teaching as much as you understand. Try understanding more. Students love the tricks that make Maths easier, including this one.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

that’s why I teach percentages as the fractions they are

What about pi%?

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

That's pi/100 still. Didn't say it was a rational number, just that it was a fraction. Though I don't see a context where it'd make sense.