this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2025
22 points (77.5% liked)
Vegan
3412 readers
17 users here now
An online space for the vegans of Lemmy.
Rules and miscellaneous:
- We take for granted that if you engage in this community, you understand that veganism is about the animals. You either are vegan for the animals, or you are not (this is not to say that discussions about climate/environment/health are not allowed, of course)
- No omni/carnist apologists. This is not a place where to ask to be hand-holded into veganims. Omnis coddling/backpatting is not tolerated, nor are /r/DebateAVegan-like threads
- Use content warnings and NSFW tags for triggering content
- Circlejerking belongs to /c/vegancirclejerk
- All posts should abide by Lemmy's Code of Conduct
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The hell does autism have to do with this? If you have to be autistic to be ethical then maybe everyone else should take a page out of the autists' book.
Also, you can be employed while eating plants. The idea that you need meat for energy is a modern fabrication by the meat industry. Look at what the Ancient Greek Olympians ate, it was mostly vegetarian with meat mostly in the festival after the games. Modern mountaineers climbing Mount Everest are told to eat sugar and carbs for energy, not meat. Unless you're a muckbanger or something what you eat has nothing to do with your job, especially if it's a computer based job where you should actually be reducing the calories you eat since you sit all day, and in that case we know that carbs are more readily converted to energy for the brain than meat. IDK about you but my appetite has plumetted now that I'm working remotely and don't leave the house most days (even though my workload has increased), and when I do I get hungry I crave bread not meat.
The datapoint you are presenting is, locally among the people you are speaking to, that of a reduced or compromised sense of justice.
Abstaining does not take energy. Far from it, it would take a tremendous act of will to consume an animal. Abstaining is the easiest thing in the world. When you have fully processed and accepted the harm and suffering it causes, it's like saying it's hard to walk around all day not murdering people. It's fucking easy!
Abstaining doesn't take energy. Quitting does, but it's a very temporary energy demand. Non smokers don't have to constantly ward off the temptation of a cigarette in the same way someone trying to quit does. It's the same for meat (and it's not even physically addictive, maybe weakly psychologically adductive but people already considering ethics should be able to overcome it very quickly). Once anything becomes habit, the unconscious part of your brain takes over most of the work of the conscious parts. If you're pouring so much energy into work that you can't even start the process, I get that, but that doesn't apply to the majority of Westerners, and certainly not white collar office workers.
Also, the feeling of doing a good thing, no matter how small, should be motivation in itself to spend energy. If I'm tired after work but still put in the effort to make a positive impact, I'm now both more tired but more happy, and being more happy lets me sleep better.
Also, this is just a tangent, I'm not diagnosed as autistic but I strongly suspect I am for a lot of reasons, is the above basically what you mean by "autistic" sense of justice? I would really hope that's an everyone thing.
Not that it's relevant to your analogy, but unlike veganism, an ex-smoker has to be constantly vigilant, because you never overcome the addiction. It's always latent, waiting for a chance to leap back to full strength in a moment of weakness.
It's very common for some autistic people to have a stronger emotional reaction to seeing people do something known to be "wrong" or harmful (like litter, or a dog off leash, or just leaving the milk out or misspelling a word). I don't think this is genuinely an enhanced sense of justice because I don't think that would be an emotional response, but that's quibbling.