politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
God damn this lazy-ass reply is frustrating. Did you even read the article? Yes, The Times news reporting story selection and neutrality has sucked at times. Do I wish that it called out the truth like The Guardian regularly does? Sure. Is it a rag? No.
But in this article Klein is saying everything that this community has been saying for months, short of advocating for violence or secession, and you're criticizing him for it. It's the definition of splitting.
He calls out Schumer and Jeffries directly as weak and complicit, and is saying we are in an authoritarian regime and we need to fight it.
I did skim through, it's entirely focused on the Democrat failure as opposition with no acknowledgement of his/his employers culpability on hyper-normalization. If he cares so much, he could do something with his platform beyond hitting the same worn out Democrat punching bad that they've hammered for decades.
Do you think he's in favor of an authoritarian regime in control of the United States?
If the answer is no, then a purity test that requires him to apologize to you for your opinion of him before he can agree with you is counterproductive to the cause of moving the fearful centrists that read the NY Times (including him and most of their columnists) closer to realizing that radical action is necessary to fix this country. People are not perfect and you will never be satisfied if you demand perfection from them.
Shutting the government down for a long period of time is the least-radical radical action they can take. After that fails, they'll continue to put all their hopes in the election. They resist acknowledging the reality that no institutions will save us because it's a fucking scary realization. Once elections fail, they'll either acknowledge the need for radical action or they'll abandon all hope and submit. My hope is that showing them repeated failures using the institutions they put their faith in will convince them of the former. The clarity that comes with acknowledging it can make fearful people courageous.
Has the NY Times and just about every other media outlet done real harm? Yes. Do the fearful centrists that we need on our side still pay attention to them? Also yes.
My point is Klein is moving in the right direction.