this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2025
316 points (97.0% liked)
Dank Memes
7403 readers
481 users here now
This is the place to be on the interweb when Reddit irreversibly becomes a meme itself and implodes
If you are existing mods from r/dankmemes, you should be mod here too, kindly DM me on either platform
The many rules inherited from
- Be nice, don't be not nice
- No Bigotry or Bullying
- Don't be a dick!
- Censor any and all personal information from posts and comments
- No spam, outside links, or videos.
- No Metabaiting
- No brigading
- Keep it dank!
- Mark NSFW and spoilers appropriately
- NO REEEEEEE-POSTS!
- No shitposting
- Format your meme correctly. No posts where the title is the meme caption!
- No agenda posting!
- Don't be a critic
- Karma threshold? What's that?
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Not to nitpick, but if 200 "fit" in 177 cars (even though car can take 4-5 persons), wit the same logic 200 fit in ~45 buses. But I too like the streets with most of the people cremated.
They "fit" as in the average number of occupants in cars is only 1.13 person. However this illustration still doesn't take in to account that these 200 people can't take the same few busses because they're likely not going from or to the same places. So the number of busses really should be significantly higher than shown.
True, but nowhere near high enough to invalidate the actual point
This also doesnt take into account that people would enter the bus even if there arent any seats remaining
And what is the average number of occupants in a bus? (genuine question)
Interesting dynamic is that I think bus occupancy tends to scales up with demand, i.e. at rush hour. Car occupancy less so (i think).
I don't know the answer - but I expect occupancy at peak travel times is of most interest.
I don't really think averages are that useful though, the whole system context is important. These diagrams are just stupid memes.