Technology

Here is a pretty good write up on it. They aren’t that different but generally I think mkv is preferred in high quality since it can handle more tracks and more codecs.

It supports more complicated subtitles and menuing, more codec support (like a LOT more) lossless support, mode audio formats.

It's like they took MP4 and added in all the stuff that you needed to replicate a BluRay, then added in lossless audio.

If you just want a movie with basic subtitles and audio, MP4 is fine. If you want to replicate newer stuff, MKV supports it.

The real hot part of this is if you have a collection of high-quality video/audio and you're streaming it to firefox, you'll natively be able to do so without transcoding.

More refined subtitle support (better timing, more flexibility in how they are presented and better timing) Complex chapter structure (think dvd menus and "bandersnatch" interactive movies and probably things nobody has thougth of doing because of lacks in the technology), segment linking (linking to a file and a timestamp, so you can reuse sections such as intros etc..) Arbitrary file support, to embed anything, text documents, subtitle font files, cover images, license information, client side storage High precision timestamps, rich metadata

One great thing is it can be extended, so it's future proof, one bad thing is, it can be extended, so of course Apple made extensions that only work on their shit

It supports more codecs and I believe can store more tracks compared to MP4. Whenever I download a high quality movie or tv show, especially if it has multiple audio tracks and subtitles to choose from, it is always packaged in .mkv