this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2025
97 points (96.2% liked)

Europe

7291 readers
1609 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No one deserves to die for speaking their truth.

That said, it isn’t the US left using the military and terrorist tactics to go after anyone who disagrees with Dear Leader

[–] OccamsRazer@lemmy.world -4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Ideological killings is terrorism

[–] msage@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Charlie Kirk was one of the biggest sources of stochastic terrorism.

So what's your point?

[–] OccamsRazer@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Stochastic" terrorism is not the same as actual terrorism, if only because you don't actually know that it's stochastic terrorism. Half of the comments on lemmy since ck died could be considered stochastic terrorism. People been saying that it's ok to kill nazis for years, but everyone has a different idea of what a nazi looks like. Just a matter of time until some nut decides someone is a Nazi and kills them. Stochastic terrorism.

[–] msage@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When people call themselves Nazis, you don't have to guess.

When people dehumanize others, you don't have to guess.

Acting intolerant loses any tolerance given from others.

It's that simple.

You can always shut up about being a bigot. When you blame minorities for things billionaires are doing, you don't deserve empathy.

[–] OccamsRazer@lemmy.world 0 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Who is calling themself a Nazi?

Who is dehumanizing who? Calling people a Nazi is dehumanizing. Not saying actual Nazis don't deserve it, but the term gets thrown around a lot, and when the message is also that Nazis should be killed, it's stochastic terrorism because somebody might act because of misunderstanding or because they are crazy. Also anyone who is intolerant thinks they aren't, or they justify their intolerance because they perceive their enemies to be intolerant or immoral or evil.

Who are some nazis that should die? Trump? Anyone who voted for him? Anyone who said something homophobic or transphobic? How do YOU identify a nazi?

[–] msage@programming.dev 1 points 22 hours ago

There are people who see no problem with calling themselves Nazis.

And when you have any of the shit-spewing right-wing grifters, like Kirk, Shapiro, Crowder, Prager, literally getting rich off spreading hate, I feel no need to defend them when they become target of their own fruit.

How else will they be stopped? They feel no remorse when 'others' die. And a LOT of people died, even in the same day as Kirk, yet those people don't give a shit.

Why should I give a shit about such people?

And where do I draw the line? Again: when you start going public with hate against minorities, you are not deserving any tolerance.

[–] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Did you have the impression that I disagree with this?

[–] OccamsRazer@lemmy.world -4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, kinda. I guess maybe you can clarify. I'm saying that killing Charlie Kirk was an act of terrorism. I guess my comment only makes sense if the perpetrator was motivated by left wing ideals ie left wing terrorism, but that isn't clear yet.

[–] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

No one can possibly know if this killing was a terrorist act. No one knows anything about the suspect yet, so far as I know. No one really knows anything except that Charlie Kirk was killed while speaking at an engagement in Utah.

This wasn’t even the most egregious shooting that happened this week. But no one seems interested in talking about the latest high school shooting.

It would be well to stick to facts. Leave speculation out of it.

[–] OccamsRazer@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah that's what I meant by my speculation only making sense in one scenario. Im fine waiting to find out.

[–] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

If you were fine waiting to find out, it seems you would’ve waited to find out. Why speculate at all if you agree that speculation is inappropriate?

Unless the real goal was to stir up some shit

[–] OccamsRazer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

My actual goal right now is to call people out for celebrating someone's death, just because they don't like that person's opinions. It's heinous, barbaric, immoral, and leads to death of democracy.

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You haven't said much since it was revealed the shooter was from a Trump suppporting Mormon family and he was a goyper.

CK wasn't far right enough for him! Does that technically make CK a left winger victim of far right extremism?

[–] OccamsRazer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Working on my house, so I haven't seen a motive yet. Has he said anything or is it still people fitting him into whatever narrative they prefer?