And yet these people want to blame it for the election loss. I think "the manosphere" has more impact on them as an easy scapegoat then it does on general voters in effecting elections.
Ok, but how many or what percentage of men like this need to exist for it to be a talking point? If it's not generalized to a significant percentage, then it's not a valid point to bring up in the first place.
I bet the party has sufficient power to restrict access to birth control. Seems crazy to consider, but if things got serious enough, I feel like they are capable of doing it.
Or maybe she wasn't a good candidate to begin with. She wasn't even nominated, so we don't know how a true, democratically elected, candidate would have performed.
There are like two of those people, not enough to be the driving factor behind Kamala losing.
It's been an endless stream of reports of scandal and cruelty since 2016. How could you not get desensitized? The alternative would be to go insane.
Uhh... Terrorism where innocent citizens are targeted is worse than specific targeting of terrorists themselves.
We had a new Engineer start, fresh out of college, and he was terrified to call people at first. Now, only a few months later, he much prefers it as a more effective means of communicating.
Someone hollered "shooter down", then Trump got up from under the pile of secret service agents. Under those circumstances it doesn't seem that strange for the crowd to be a little pumped up. But yes, these situations usually take a few days to settle and for the facts to come out. Rumor mills and conspiracy theory engines are going to be in overdrive meanwhile.
Yes but a lot of people who think they stand for something instead fell for anything.
For real, also an appeal to victim status coming from a successful doctor doesn't hit quite the same.
Isn't that a picture of kamala?