this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2025
-11 points (21.1% liked)
Asklemmy
50428 readers
493 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I find that my Sony RX100 produces better photos than my Pixel phone. It has an auto mode that generally picks the right settings.
The pictures are more detailed and less blurry, especially in low light.
The only post processing necessary is copying the pictures from the SD card, which is admittedly a pretty big hassle.
You're right about buying one second hand, since they're incredibly expensive.
Why is it a hassle?
The SD card? I have to track down my SD card reader, copy the pictures over, and then upload them to my photo service. It's not a huge amount of work, but I'm pretty lazy.
My rx100 doesn't have Wi-Fi. I assume newer cameras would do that automatically, but I don't want to spend $600+ to get another good point n shoot.