this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2025
354 points (99.4% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

64213 readers
899 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/37289075

Comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dmention7@midwest.social 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm not the person you were replying to, but the only issue I ever had using Jellyfin for music was that it seemed.a little finicky about matching artist/album when pulling down metadata, and I had to do more manual intervention.

The actual streaming functionality seemed perfectly fine, but I personally settled on Navidrome for music.

[–] cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do you run the files through something like MusicBrainz Picard first? I want to uniformly tag all my music anyway, so I would do that regardless of which media server I used, but it could be doing a poor job if it does not have a MusicBrainz ID associated with it?

[–] dmention7@midwest.social 3 points 2 days ago

No, I wasn't doing any pre-processing other than "properly" formatting the track name and folder structure. So I can't really blame Jellyfin, because I know that tagging is part of the best process workflow. But I've just found Navidrome seems to be a little more hands off.