this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2025
536 points (97.9% liked)

Political Humor

1422 readers
988 users here now

Welcome to Political Humor!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social -1 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Be honest.

Power is freely givenThey stay in power because their civilians are just as psychopathic as they are, and enjoy genocide as a treat.

[–] slate@sh.itjust.works 12 points 12 hours ago (2 children)
  1. Manipulating tens/hundreds of millions of people into voting for something is not easy
  2. Some of these people weren't exactly democratically elected
[–] theUwUhugger@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Only Netanyahu was elected democratically of the three…

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

All three were democratically elected. Even Putin, before he dismantled Russian democracy.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

There was no democracy in Russia at any point in time. Putin was placed in charge to restore USSR, and he didn't win by chance.

North Korea also has elections, so does Iran, Belarus, the difference is that we always know who will win.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 11 hours ago

I'm not sure where you got that from, but no, Putin won three* free and fair elections, one as PM and two as president.

*My memory is iffy so it could be that his reelection as president wasn't a fair election, but the preceding two were.

[–] theUwUhugger@lemmy.world 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Simply untrue?

The us system is so wildly undemocratic with its two party, first past the post, electoral college that definitionally it cannot be considered a democracy!

We may never know what happen and happened in russia! Boris Yeltsin, the president before Putin, literally disappeared for weeks then suddenly reappeared next to Putin to hold speeches… And you are telling me that Putin was elected democratically for the first round?

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The us system is so wildly undemocratic with its two party, first past the post, electoral college that definitionally it cannot be considered a democracy!

We can get into the philosophy of it, but Trump was as democratically elected as any other president in US history.

And you are telling me that Putin was elected democratically for the first round?

Until you can provide evidence to the contrary, yes.

[–] theUwUhugger@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

-Yea, which is not democratic at all as the us is definitionally not a democracy!

-It literally has a wikipedia page(https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Putin%27s_rise_to_power)… Being oblivious does not equate to being a sceptic!

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social -1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)
  1. Letting these genociders continue their conquests is power being gifted.
  2. There is nothing preventing civilians from taking those powers back.
  3. How many more old despots do civilians want to uphold?
[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

You forgot the massive part played by manufactured consent. Attacking education and massively buying mass media, makes it that elections become what they are now. An illusion of choice. Freedom of information is a central pillar of democracy, you can't make educated choices if you're not educated.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Which goes back to point one: Civilians enjoy being manufactured consent. They enjoy attacking education, controlling media, and maintaining the corrupt dual systems of elections. The illusion of choice, is a choice, many still decide to uphold. Anti-intellectualism is core aspect of authoritarianism, and a pillar of seizing the thoughts of the population. You can't make informed choices without indoctrination centers in guise of education.

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

They can't enjoy it because they don't know it's happening, that's literally why it's called manufactured consent. It's not real consent.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Yet, conservatives are fine firing teachers, ruining their budgets, burning books, denying diversity, digressively victimizing, etc. and consent to illiteracy, being conned, and conning others.
Fanaticism is a choice, and they choose it, every time.
Maybe calling it willful manufacturing their demise might be closer, but consent they willfully partake.

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

That's a consequence and a symptom, not the cause. The people manufacturing the consent and the one being manipulated into it are different groups of people. One is choosing and consenting, the other ones are more victims than anything else. It doesn't excuse the heinous shit some of them do or believe, but it explains it.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 2 points 11 hours ago

The cause is choosing to be manufactured consent. Choosing that manufacturing is the consequence we keep revisiting. If the ones being manipulated stopped to think “maybe we keep choosing wrong” they wouldn't be in position where manufacturing consent would exist, they would instead choose to simply collaborate with despots that happen to be corrupt old white men.