this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2025
510 points (99.2% liked)

Funny

11513 readers
1272 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 52 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I want a larger battery and flush camera.

[–] Vupware@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Flush camera seems like such a boon, I don’t know why the major manufacturers insist on these abhorrent bumps.

[–] lemming741@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago

Because reviewers started obsessing with zero bezels and thinness, so manufacturers had to also maximize those things.

I saw a laptop review where there was a hole punch camera, so no mechanical shutter. The yt personality thought that was stupid, so they asked the manufacturer what they were thinking. "Our last product had the shutter but you gave it a poor review because the bezels were too big. We designed for smaller bezels to get a better review"

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

People demand that their phones take decent pictures, and that’s really difficult without focal length. Which in turn is really difficult to decrease.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 10 points 1 day ago

So make the entire phone the same thickness and make use of the extra space

[–] CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yes, decent, as in just ok. I want more battery. If I want amazing photos, i would buy a camera.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I shopped around for a camera, my only requirements were pocket size (easy) and open-point-shoot quickly, like in a couple of seconds (impossible).

I double tap my volume button and take a photo in 1-2 seconds with my phone, Leika lense stuff (not obnoxiously potruding), way enough for me.

Would love a really small fast camera though, but waiting 15-20 seconds for it all to whirr together takes like the fun out of it for me.

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yeah agreed. I honestly don’t take enough pictures to care about the camera. I do occasionally play games on my phone so I get stuck with the bump because those are the ones that can play games. I too wish for larger battery.

But the reason they insist on going with the bumps is because people expect the phone to take a decent photo. They can probably make one without the bump but it is unlikely that most people would buy it (or be happy with it).

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

I mean, if the entire phone was made the same thickness as the camera bump, that would give more room for a larger battery and more powerful components, and frankly, it would still be a pretty thin phone, and easier to handle (oh, and they could put the fingerprint scanner back on the back where it's convenient and reliable)

People don't want to lug a camera all over the place just in case they want a good photo, they want to be able to make a decent photo with the small brick that they always have with them anyway

And I am one of them. While I might not care too much about the highest quality pictures, I would still appreciate better ones if possible

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Check out Ulefone. They have a line of phones with 15-22Ah batteries. My phone weighs 1.4lbs. I always have streaming video playing, and I recharge every 3 days.

[–] VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Quick question. Does your ruggedized phone have a transflective LCD display? I'm just now doing some quick searches and am seeing the technology only being unsed in ruggedized (non-touchscreen) laptops.