this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2025
182 points (91.4% liked)

Technology

75143 readers
2384 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
182
What would stop you from switching to a flip phone (or dumbphone) in 2025? (tim.kicker.dev)
submitted 1 day ago by tim@feddit.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
141 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I’ve been using a flip phone as my daily driver for a while now. The smartphone is still around, but it mostly sits in a drawer until bureaucracy or banking apps force me to use it.

For me, the benefits are clear: less distraction, more focus, better sleep. But I know for many people it’s not so easy. Essential apps, social pressure, work requirements… these are real blockers.

I’d like to start a discussion (almost like an informal poll):

  • If you thought about switching, what’s the single biggest thing that holds you back?

  • Is it banking? Messaging? Maps? Something else?

I’m genuinely curious because if we can identify the main pain points, maybe it’s possible to work on solutions or even start a small project around it.

So: what would need to change for you to actually give a flip phone a try?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

But then I start to feel like

this guy, with the "real" camera and the phone camera, but the phone camera is the one I've most consistently got on me, because I can't lug a whole additional piece of hardware around in a camera bag, meanwhile the phone camera pictures are grainy and shitty, and I'd just as soon have a Pixel in my pocket at all times that can take fairly good pictures at all times.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 3 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Fair enough, though modern cameras are much smaller:

Dimensions of a recent Sony mirrorless camera, shown without lens.

[–] kazzz7420@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

this won't fit into a pocket though.

maybe you can reasonably throw into a handbag. but it quickly became a logistical nightmare, with how you're essentially stuck with cheap/kit lens (to make it small enough) and humidity is also a deal breaker.

also, would you want to abuse a not-cheap APS-C camera that way? I wouldn't lol

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Without the lens, exactly.

Realistically, cameras can be put into two categories - they either effortlessly fit in your pocket, or don't, and any that don't tend to get left home unless you intend to specifically go take photos. Doesn't really matter how much bigger it is at that point.
And if you have a high end smartphone, you probably can't get a camera that fits in your pocket that would be significantly better.

As the saying goes, the best camera is the one you have with you.