this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2025
222 points (98.7% liked)

Fuck AI

4038 readers
345 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lunarul@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Perplexity doesn't seem connfused

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If we're incredibly generous with what we call emoji then old MSN seahorses might count (if they actually existed, that is). Emojis aren't all part of the spec. They predated the spec and colloquially people don't mean the spec. Plus, Unicode has always been about matching human usage of things, not dictating how humans communicate. So if you apply the way emoji was used to refer to icons on phones before they were in Unicode, I think you could argue that a seahorse icon in MSN messenger was an emoji.

[–] lunarul@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Wtf are you on about? Emoji existed since the 80s and the ones in IM apps were the most popular examples. It's not "incredibly generous" to call them emoji, that's what we called them back then, long before they started being included in unicode.

Unicode has always been about matching human usage of things

Exactly. Emoji usage was so widespread and popular, that they decided to standardize it.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Why so hostile only to agree?

[–] lunarul@lemmy.world 0 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

If we're incredibly generous with what we call emoji

This (and all the other "if"s in the comment) implies you do not agree that pre-unicode emoji count as emoji. I find that an extremely odd stance considering the popularity of emoji during those times.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 19 hours ago

The fact that some people disagree that there is a "seahorse emoji" means it is controversial, so I'm saying "if" because it's more of a fuzzy topic. Plus if I just say any sort of smiley pictograph (not counting emoticons) is an emoji, I guarantee you someone would've "um actually"ed me. That stuff really annoys me, so unless I do research before making a comment I try to speak in general terms. This is a habit I've learned from my career as well. I try to make it clear when I'm certain I'm right versus when I'm only pretty sure I'm right. My comment was entirely based on my memory of reading things about this in the past. It's way to time consuming to verify I'm right before I post, so I say "if" and "likely" a lot.