this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2025
768 points (94.8% liked)

Political Memes

1831 readers
1266 users here now

Non political memes: !memes@sopuli.xyz

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world -3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

To Blame has a very specific dictionary definition. Blaming the victim... For what?

To Blame (Verb): assign responsibility for a fault or wrong.

How am I "blaming" you If I were to use mouth-breather against a red hat loser or nazi — how is that blaming someone else for literally having a physiological issue that pertains to mouth-breathing? Did I ever state that it was your fault for having to breathe through the mouth? If I did, then that would be victim-blaming. Moreover, does that mean we cannot speak on any uncomfortable topic that may exert an undue trigger for any bystander reading? E.g., Maybe I raise the topic of cancer to talk about, but then someone says, "Hey, you're victim-blaming me because you brought up cancer and that makes me uncomfortable because my mom just died from that and I don't want to see those words online!"? Does that mean we can never discuss any topic or use any word that may be an emotional trigger for someone in an edge-case circumstance?

To your question on the N-word, no, probably not. I thought about this a bit and I perceive certain words that at least in modern terms have etymological origins or modern use to be strictly FOR slurs. That is, I don't use the homophobic f-word slur, or N-Word in any context because I think they ARE inherently loaded terms. But being short? Breathing through the mouth? Missing a chromosome? I defend these vulnerable group every single day against asshole bigots of the right. The slur only works against bigots because they perceive it as a slur in the first place. I don't. You don't. That's what matters.

Now instead of the f-word, what I might say to a machismo red-hatted straight guy to poke at their own macho-man complex, "Wow, buddy, that sounds pretty gay!"

Notice that I don't believe the underlying term in this case is a slur because that's a perfectly normal state of being, but I know they do, and that it would strike at their ego.

That said, I am very sorry for you experienced that. Anyone who mocks you directly for that is 100% a piece of shit.

Edit: Additional question: is it then wrong to say that either Biden or Trump is old and senile? Suffering from dementia because other people may have dementia or because they know someone who has dementia?

[–] ganryuu@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Anyone who mocks you directly for that is 100% a piece of shit.

Anyone who uses their disability to mock anyone is a piece of shit.

There, I fixed it for you.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world -2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

I understand you currently believe this — but that's kind of the heart and point of contention in our discussion now, is it not? You're just reiterating what has already been stated as the opposing side. I am aware.

Thoughts on the rest of my comment, or are you going just for low-hanging fruit?

[–] ganryuu@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Low-hanging fruit, others have tried to educate you yet you still cling to your very wrong belief, I just wanted to add to their voices.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Your fallacy is: Ad Populum. Go to a conservative sub, and you'll be in the minority and many users will say the same to you. Does that mean you're wrong? If all I get are mostly low-hanging fruit responses, that's not very convincing.