17
Is 128 players too much for a multiplayer FPS? Yes, says Battlefield 6
(www.rockpapershotgun.com)
this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
17 points (100.0% liked)
Gaming
3891 readers
386 users here now
The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community
For news, discussions and memes!
Community Rules
This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:
- No NSFW content
You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.
What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:
- Respectful Communication: We strive for positive, constructive dialogue and encourage all members to engage with one another in a courteous and understanding manner.
- Inclusivity: Embracing diversity is at the core of our community. We welcome members from all walks of life and expect interactions to be conducted without discrimination.
- Privacy: Your privacy is paramount. Please respect the privacy of others just as you expect yours to be treated. Personal information should never be shared without consent.
- Integrity: We believe in the integrity of speech and action. As such, honesty is expected, and deceptive practices are strictly prohibited.
- Collaboration: Whether you're here to learn, teach, or simply engage in discussion, collaboration is key. Support your fellow members and contribute positively to shared learning and growth.
If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Comments like these reduce my faith in BF6.
The problem wasn't too many players. It was maps that didn't accommodate that amount of players. Squad for example doesn't quite support 128, but 100 players and it's the norm and plays well.
I don't know if they're willfully ignoring their mistakes and really think 128 players is just not possible for a good game or if it's just heinous corpo talk, trying to shift the blame away from their bad implementation.