That's certainly an unusual take. If you are a backend to HTTP and something throws a completely bogus URL out of left field at you, that's not by any means a backend error.

I guess your take is that it might be some sort of usability issue or such because if 95% of clients try to hit the same non-existant URL, that probably means there's some reasonable expectation that you should do something about the URL. However that's relatively more rare a sort of 'invalid URL' scenario. The vast vast majority are some sort of scanners trying bogus crap, followed by an impossibly diverse set of typos and peculiar one-off assumptions that you can't possibly reasonably cover.

[–] homura1650@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If it's not a backend error, you shouldn't be throwing a 5xx error code. Since you are throwing a 500, you have a server bug; even if that bug is simply "sends incorrect error code"

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Ok, got you, thought you were saying a bad url from client was inherently a backend mistake.