this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2025
214 points (99.1% liked)

Palestine

2005 readers
571 users here now

A community to discuss everything Palestine.

Rules:

  1. Posts can be in Arabic or English.

  2. Please add a flair in the title of every post. Example: “[News] Israel annexes the West Bank ”, “[Culture] Musakhan is the nicest food in the world!”, “[Question] How many Palestinians live in Jordan?”

List of flairs: [News] [Culture] [Discussion] [Question] [Request] [Guide]

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Good point, they only oppose genocide opportunistically, whereas the US / NATO countries support genocide, but in a good wholesome way.

/s

[–] TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean... both would be opportunistically, but that wasn't my point. I support a free Palestine, I'm on your guys' side (despite the downvotes)! I was just trying to say that Russia's condemnation of one genocide doesn't really mean shit in my opinion, especially while enacting their own genocide barely 1000 miles away.

tl;dr I was shit-talking Russia, not Palestine

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Just so you know, the insistence of western liberals on reducing the word 'genocide' to just mean 'anything bad our enemies do' is a big part of how Israel was able to perform an actual genocide with as little push-back as it's getting.

[–] TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

That's a good point. Not what I was trying to do but it probably came off as that way to some. Thanks for the insight

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Certainly that was what that nonsense about "Russia enacting their own genocide barely 1000 miles away" ultimately is

[–] TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world -3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I wouldn't say the atrocities in Gaza or the Donbas are EQUAL, no, not at all. For one thing, the Ukrainians are actually allowed to fight back without being labeled as terrorists. But Russia's goals (and some actions, mostly conducted earlier in the conflict) certainly fit the definition of genocide

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

No, they don't; that's just the western liberal need to slap the genocide label on every bad thing enemy countries do (because they've already normalized every other war crime)

[–] TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world -3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

The internationally recognized, legal definition of a genocide is 'the deliberate or systematic destruction, in part or in whole, of a national, racial, ethnic, or religious group' including (among other things) the forcible transfer of children from one group to another. And Russia has been trying very hard for a while now to erase Ukrainians from eastern Ukraine and replace them with Russians.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

‘the deliberate or systematic destruction, in part or in whole, of a national, racial, ethnic, or religious group’

Which Russia is not attempting to do.

And Russia has been trying very hard for a while now to erase Ukrainians from eastern Ukraine and replace them with Russians.

See what I mean? Western liberals will make up any old bullshit to accuse their enemies of genocide; which is a big part of why an actual genocide gets so little push back: because people like you have run the term into the ground.

[–] TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world -4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Which Russia is not attempting to do

Okay Botski, then what about this?

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

A lie, as usual for NATOpedia. Ukraine after years of insistence by Russia prepared list of... 339 names, of which 161 was found living with parents in Germany.