this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2025
31 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

4264 readers
647 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FishFace@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Yes, they should have more on that. I agree that in the long run it won't make much difference (and greater protection for renters is sorely needed) but probably in the short term there is something to it, because the supply of rental housing and the supply of owner-occupied housing are not completely equivalent, that is, one cannot move freely from one to the other. That means that exchanging some rental supply for OO supply may, at least in the short term, cause house prices to go down and rents to go up (slightly).

Obviously what should happen is that people will be better able to buy a first home and vacate rented accommodation for OO housing, bringing the pressure back down, but that will not be instantaneous. So yeah, better analysis needed, but it's not like the concerns there are just made up with nothing underpinning htem.