this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2025
37 points (89.4% liked)

Comradeship // Freechat

2567 readers
126 users here now

Talk about whatever, respecting the rules established by Lemmygrad. Failing to comply with the rules will grant you a few warnings, insisting on breaking them will grant you a beautiful shiny banwall.

A community for comrades to chat and talk about whatever doesn't fit other communities

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
felipeforte@lemmygrad.ml
37
Do some people just regurgitate arguments blindly? (lemmygrad.ml)
submitted 3 days ago by King_Simp@lemmygrad.ml to c/comradeship@lemmygrad.ml
30 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I notice this with people talking about capitalism, obviously, but honestly what drove me to make this post is the attempted arguments against veganism. They're basically 95% unoriginal and fail under the most basic of scrutiny.

Take, for example, "not eating the meat won't bring the cow back." Under basically any logical scrutiny, this is a clear double standard to any other purchasing decision in capitalist society, and doesn't really make any sense. But I've seen in so many times over the years, so much so that im planning on becoming a vegan over a period of time. Not because of any arguments vegans make, but because somehow pro-meat eaters are losing a debate to a brick wall, and the conclusions I've made myself have convinced myself that I should be vegan. And I'm really starting to ask, do people just...like...ctrl+c ctrl+v arguments in their head?

I...try to be nice. But...how little respect to your own ability do you have if you do that? Not only to justify something you really don't have to, but something you obviously dont care about. I mean...sorry, it's just baffling to me.

In the words of Kim Kitsuragi from disco elysium, "I dont understand officer...please, help me understand"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cowbee@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 3 days ago

People collect arguments like they do Magic cards and deploy them whenever they want to pick a fight. The validity of the argument is in how it morally justifies the worldview of the debatelord, not in actual material reality.