this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2025
547 points (99.6% liked)

politics

25690 readers
3346 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sure you have, it was called Trump's first term.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works -1 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

No, you're not. The average US consumer, even those who are desperately poor, still has significantly more buying power than the vast majority of the planet. A collapse in American agriculture will just mean a vast upswing in food imports, because for most of the world it will always be more profitable to sell that food to a US grocery chain than it will be to sell it locally. This will increase costs for US consumers, and push more Americans into poverty, but it won't cause a famine in the USA.

What you are well on your way towards is causing famines across vast portions of the world that aren't you. Famines that Americans will barely even notice, much less care about.

[–] Soulg@ani.social 6 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah poor people can just make more money to buy the more expensive food, it's genius

[–] Zink@programming.dev 1 points 11 hours ago

I think they are saying that our poor people already have "more money," at least relative to others who might get that food.

And the bug you describe is also a feature if you're the greedy fucker at the top trying to take advantage of desperate people.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 3 points 14 hours ago

Show me in my previous comment where I said that.

My point was not "Americans will be OK." I explicitly said that a collapse of American agriculture would push many more Americans into poverty.

But poverty is not famine. As awful as poverty is, famine is actually, somehow, worse. Poverty kills people, and in the scenario imagined it would kill many more people, but the absolute worst impacts would still be felt in places much further afield. America's failure would create destructive ripple effects across the world.

[–] oddlyqueer@lemmy.ml 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

IDK, there are already a lot of people hanging on by a thread in the US. A collapse in domestic production that leads to higher prices will push more people under the "secure" line. I think it'll also cause food shortages worldwide but I think you're overestimating how many Americans will be insulated.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, I believe I covered that when I said "and push more Americans into poverty".

I'm not ignoring the plight of those people for whom starvation would be a very real threat in this scenario. But that's not the same thing as famine, and thinking that it is reflects a uniquely American level of isolation from the realities of the world. Poverty is terrifying - I've experienced it myself - but it is an entirely different order of magnitude from famine.

I know people who've experienced famine. I know people who've told me stories about taking a shit, and then immediately scooping it up and eating it just to sate the desparate, unbearable need to have some kind of food in their stomach. That's the level of insanity famine drives you to. It's a scale of hunger you and I can't even comprehend.

Nowhere in my previous comment did I say "It will be OK if American agriculture collapses." It would be awful. Many people would die, many more would suffer. But the absolute worst of that suffering wouldn't happen in the US, it would happen in other parts of the world that most Americans can't even name.

[–] oddlyqueer@lemmy.ml 1 points 12 hours ago

I don't know what the odds are on the US or a part of the US reaching the technical definition of famine, I'm just saying I wouldn't put it in the "definitely not happening" category. And it wouldn't be because there's not enough food available, more like the government is actively aggravating domestic food production and international trade and they're bumbling morons, which is a combination that could easily get us into shortages where a large chunk of the population is starving. And depending on which Americans it affects (or affects the most), the government may not care. Not saying it's definitely going to happen, but I think it's naive to say it definitely won't just based on America's buying power.

FWIW I agree that the current situation, whatever it's impact on America's food security, will impact other parts of the world more severely. I'm sure America's shit will still roll downhill.