this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2025
429 points (99.5% liked)

politics

25671 readers
4502 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sure you have, it was called Trump's first term.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 1 points 14 minutes ago

A really good piece on the realities of this topic is here: https://youtu.be/badGHJLDpP8

TL;DW: Farmers thought they were voting for cheap labor and a bailout, like they got last time. They also thought that, as wealthy landowners^1^, they were on the "right side" of these disastrous trade policies and were going to be carried through this mess.


^1.^ I struggled with this concept at first. Things have changed a lot since the pre-WWII era that conjures up images of Ma & Pa Kent in a weathered century-home, on a lonely corn farm in Kansas. It's big business now. Good farm land isn't cheap, equipment is expensive, (legitimate) labor is expensive, fertilizer & irrigation costs a lot, pest control costs, crops are risky in general, and so on. When you work out how much money is moving around and what a farm's net worth is, these people are millionaires even if they're not in the black all the time.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

are the farmers in dire straits, or are independent farmers in dire straights?

i make the distinction because of the purpose is to make the rich, richer, then this is a feature, not a bug for republicans

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Yeah it's just the independent farmers. Here in Arkansas they're either losing their farms or straight up killing themselves, at a brisk pace too.

[–] oddlyqueer@lemmy.ml 1 points 59 minutes ago

Happens here too. And who scoops up the land when it gets liquidated? JD goddamn Vance and his vultures.

All part of the plan :(

[–] Ironfist79@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

We're well on our way towards famine.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 1 points 50 minutes ago

Well, you folks are just speed running the apocalypse, aren't you.

Pestilence, War and now potentially Famine.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 1 points 54 minutes ago

I think it’s more of the old republic Roman issue, the small farmers are being eaten up by giant corporate mega farms. Food production will continue but as a monopoly, where they can charge you $100 for a head of lettuce if they feel like it.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

No, you're not. The average US consumer, even those who are desperately poor, still has significantly more buying power than the vast majority of the planet. A collapse in American agriculture will just mean a vast upswing in food imports, because for most of the world it will always be more profitable to sell that food to a US grocery chain than it will be to sell it locally. This will increase costs for US consumers, and push more Americans into poverty, but it won't cause a famine in the USA.

What you are well on your way towards is causing famines across vast portions of the world that aren't you. Famines that Americans will barely even notice, much less care about.

[–] Soulg@ani.social 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Yeah poor people can just make more money to buy the more expensive food, it's genius

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 1 points 27 minutes ago

Show me in my previous comment where I said that.

My point was not "Americans will be OK." I explicitly said that a collapse of American agriculture would push many more Americans into poverty.

But poverty is not famine. As awful as poverty is, famine is actually, somehow, worse. Poverty kills people, and in the scenario imagined it would kill many more people, but the absolute worst impacts would still be felt in places much further afield. America's failure would create destructive ripple effects across the world.

[–] oddlyqueer@lemmy.ml 1 points 54 minutes ago (1 children)

IDK, there are already a lot of people hanging on by a thread in the US. A collapse in domestic production that leads to higher prices will push more people under the "secure" line. I think it'll also cause food shortages worldwide but I think you're overestimating how many Americans will be insulated.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 1 points 31 minutes ago

Yes, I believe I covered that when I said "and push more Americans into poverty".

I'm not ignoring the plight of those people for whom starvation would be a very real threat in this scenario. But that's not the same thing as famine, and thinking that it is reflects a uniquely American level of isolation from the realities of the world. Poverty is terrifying - I've experienced it myself - but it is an entirely different order of magnitude from famine.

I know people who've experienced famine. I know people who've told me stories about taking a shit, and then immediately scooping it up and eating it just to sate the desparate, unbearable need to have some kind of food in their stomach. That's the level of insanity famine drives you to. It's a scale of hunger you and I can't even comprehend.

Nowhere in my previous comment did I say "It will be OK if American agriculture collapses." It would be awful. Many people would die, many more would suffer. But the absolute worst of that suffering wouldn't happen in the US, it would happen in other parts of the world that most Americans can't even name.

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

But at least the leopards are still well-fed

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 28 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

This was all a calculated strategy to make independent farmers go bankrupt and into foreclosure, so that the big agritech companies could snag prime agricultural land for pennies on the dollar.

At some point, most food will be grown by corporations that can set whatever price they want for that food, and people will have to pay that price or starve to death. It’s the definition of “captured audience” that makes the Parasite Class extract so much wealth from the working class and become so fantastically wealthy.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 points 56 minutes ago

I sincerely doubt it was calculated. This regime can’t think past its next Big Mac. The toddler in chief is far too reactionary to actually have a strategy beyond tomorrow’s unconstitutional removal of a public figure speaking out against republicans. It is highly convenient and will be taken advantage of by Big Ag to the fullest - and expect there to be clear favorites among Agribusiness just like when the media bent a knee to Trump and showered him with money.

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Has this not already happened? The mythos of the independent farmer has existed since the great depression. I'm not convinced independent farmers actually exist anymore. Farmers are serfs who buy their seeds and their herbicides/fertilizers from Monsanto, and their tractors from John Deere. They lease the land from generational trusts and wall-street speculators.
Why would a corporation want to assume the risk of actually producing anything?

[–] oddlyqueer@lemmy.ml 1 points 51 minutes ago

It's been happening steadily for a while, Trump just opened up a lot of avenues to accelerate it. There are still a lot of small and medium family farms that own their land and equipment.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 14 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Durrrrrr I'm gonna crack down on immigrant farm labor while I add lots of tariffs to foreign food durrrrrrrrrr

Fuckers trying to make America North Korea again

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago
[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 15 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You got exactly what you voted for you jackasses.

Go protest, cause I'd love the farmers to be antifa.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

They might even already have pitchforks

[–] Ceruleum@lemmy.wtf 3 points 7 hours ago

Insert Nelson meme, "haha!""

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 18 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Well, at least they don't have to worry about "liberals" inflicting horrible thoughts on them via Colbert or Kimmel.

Are they tired of all the winning yet?

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

According to the bots in r/Conservative, they are not.

[–] Rakonat@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Because conservative ideology requires an other to rally hate against so the base and core voters don't realize its the elites and party leaders adding suffering to common folk lives for the elites short term benefit.

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 2 points 7 hours ago

Wisdom is chasing them, but they are faster.

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 10 hours ago

I guess they have very short memories

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 7 hours ago

Sad trombone.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 120 points 15 hours ago (10 children)

Despite his troubles, Maxwell remains supportive of Trump, saying that he is “going to be patient,” adding, “I believe in our president.”

However, there is a limit to Maxwell’s patience with Trump. “We’re giving him the chance to follow through with the tariffs, but there had better be results,” he said. “I think we need to be seeing something in 18 months or less. We understand risk—and it had better pay off.”

They're giving him 18 MONTHS?? For fuck sake, these people Do. Not. Learn.

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 13 points 11 hours ago

They didn't learn in his first term. No way they'll learn anything here either. These people are completely fucking stupid and never voted for him based on any kind of intelligence.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 8 points 10 hours ago

He's not trying to learn anything, he just wanted an excuse to kick the can down the road 18 months.

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 56 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It’s only 24 months. I bet it won’t even take the whole 36 months. Just a quick and easy definitely less than 48 months.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 108 points 16 hours ago (6 children)

“So much of what has happened and what’s going on here is totally out of our control,” Meadows said. “We just want a free, fair, and open market where we can sell our goods... as competitively as anybody else around the world. And we do feel that we produce a superior product here in the United States, and we just need to have the markets.”

The Republican small government, everyone

Why do I feel like these same people would say Biden’s economy was worse for them?

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 58 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

“The weather is in the control of a higher power,” he added, “and the economy and the markets are in control of Washington, DC.”

Yep! Nothing at all that could have been done about either of these situations. Just two natural disasters sent by god themself. What a shame.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 51 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] snooggums@piefed.world 24 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

They learned nothing from his first term where he screwed them over by targeting immigrants and he just dialed that part up and added more.

Absolute morons.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago

Yeah but imagine voting for a black woman. The dem candidate could have promised them wild subsidies the likes the they never dreamed, but if it was “sleepy joe” or any other minority they disliked they still would have chosen Trump

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 50 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

MARC ANDEREESON wanted to buy up farm land in Solarno CA, for his "California Forever" private owned town.

Thiel has expressed similar.

Musk has his own corporate town (Starbase, Texas).

Bezos has an area of Malaysia.

Zuck has parts of Hawaii.

Sam Altman invests in a private town in Honduras.

....they ALL want private towns, fifedoms to rule over in America. And by rule over, I mean SETTING THEIR OWN LAWS.

This is happening.

Anyways, I'm sure this story on Trump bankrupting farmers is completely unrelated. I certainly have no evidence it's related. But I think it's concerning (farmers refusing to sell large tracts of America is what held up the "California Forever" project).

You Aren't Allowed in These Billionaire Towns

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

MARC ANDEREESON wanted to buy up farm land in Solarno CA, for his “California Forever” private owned town.

what i hear from locals (mom moved there) is he wanted to buy the dump outside town on which to build his little billionaireburg.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago

"fuckin whoops"

[–] 7112@lemmy.world 71 points 16 hours ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 19 points 13 hours ago

Complains that Americans are too lazy to milk cows and doesn't realize they are part of that group. Doubt they will learn anything.

[–] jason.crabtree@piefed.social 6 points 11 hours ago

But they'll continue to vote Republican.

load more comments
view more: next ›