this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2025
544 points (99.5% liked)

News

32501 readers
3541 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate has confirmed 48 of President Donald Trump’s nominees at once, voting for the first time under new rules to begin clearing a backlog of executive branch positions that had been delayed by Democrats.

Frustrated by the stalling tactics, Senate Republicans moved last week to make it easier to confirm large groups of lower-level, non-judicial nominations. Democrats had forced multiple votes on almost every one of Trump’s picks, infuriating the president and tying up the Senate floor.

The new rules allow Senate Republicans to move multiple nominees with a simple majority vote — a process that would have previously been blocked with just one objection. The rules don’t apply to judicial nominations or high-level Cabinet posts.

“Republicans have fixed a broken process,” Thune said ahead of the vote.

The Senate voted 51-47 to confirm the four dozen nominees. Thune said that those confirmed on Thursday had all received bipartisan votes in committee, including deputy secretaries for the Departments of Defense, Interior, Energy and others.

Among the confirmed are Jonathan Morrison, the new administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and Kimberly Guilfoyle as U.S. ambassador to Greece. Guilfoyle is a former California prosecutor and television news personality who led the fundraising for Trump’s 2020 campaign and was once engaged to Trump’s son, Donald Trump Jr.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Implementing fair voting laws is not authoritarianism.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Neither is playing Hard Ball, and forcing the MAGAs to follow the Constitution.

This idea that it is AUTHORITARIAN to insist that everyone abide by the Constitution, is insane.

[–] amorpheus@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Have you considered that the constitution is part of the problem?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, I fucking haven't, because it's not the problem. The problem is people who think it's a problem.

[–] amorpheus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You're in for a rude awakening if you think a system set up by white slave owners in a time when horseback was the fastest method of communication is standing the test of time that well. It's amazing that it hasn't fallen apart sooner, but that's only because your politicians had a basic respect for the system.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The basic concepts of all people being created equal, the God-given RIGHT of all people to enjoy Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness, elections, the Bill of Rights, etc. are all guaranteed in the Constitution and other founding documents, and the fact that we codified those concepts into our founding documents 250 years ago is irrelevant. They are timeless concepts that are as applicable and important today, as they were when they were first written.

Sure, there are some portions that have gotten creaky, and numerous amendments have tried to clarify or add new rights, but the basic concepts outlined in those documents are still among the best concepts on which to base a government.

We can still make improvements, but tossing out the Constitution, and hoping the MAGA Nazi Traitors will replace it with something better, is ludicrous beyond measure.

Our current Constitution is far better than anything else I've seen as a suggested replacement, which has mostly been nothing. The MAGA idea seems to be to just toss out the Constitution, et al, and replace it with Trump's whims.

[–] amorpheus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Thanks for the long response. I've written "part of the problem" intentionally, because we're seeing the checks and balances be lacking in the face of people who are more focused on their own goals than the broader message outlined in the document.

Overall it's still a great piece of work, as long as you can keep things together long enough to address the shortcomings. I'm not one to suggest throwing it away, but I know amendments are hard, and making any isn't even under discussion with the current government.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And how does one “implement a law”?

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)
[–] missfrizzle@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 week ago

SNL updated it for the Executive Order era: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUDSeb2zHQ0

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I'm still confused a little bit on the part where they vote on it. It doesn't seem to indicate the people who vote no to all attempts at fair voting laws.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're seriously asking how members of Congress can "implement a law?"

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No. I'm seriously asking how people expect Democrats to get a damn thing done with republicans preventing everything. Everybody wants to point to the ten minutes when Democrats had both houses and the president, but I think that's really naïve.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

This is just a long worn out excuse that I've been seeing people claim for decades now. When Democrats are in power, they always claim they can't accomplish anything meaningful because of Republican opposition. When Republicans are in power, Democrats always claim they can accomplish anything meaningful because they can't oppose anything. The reality in both cases is that Democrats capitulate to Republicans every time. This is because they don't work the American people. They work for their wealthy donors who are the same wealthy donors the Republicans work for. The rest is just an act to convince people that the parties oppose one another when they really don't.

When Obama was president and Dems controlled both chambers of congress, they still watered down their own legislation in order to "reach across the aisle" even though it didn't accomplish a damn thing and didn't help a single American. They also handed over Obama's SCOTUS nomination to Republicans and then gave what should have been Biden's SCOTUS nomination to Trump without a fight which is how we got a 6-3 stacked Supreme Court. Currently we have people like Schumer passing Republican legislation, hundreds of house Dems voting against impeaching Trump, both parties in complete alignment on Gaza, both parties voting unanimously to pass dystopian legislation like The TAKE IT DOWN Act.

Both parties are rotten and working toward the same goal. To think anything else is naive. Stop falling for the kayfabe.