this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2025
338 points (99.7% liked)

Fediverse

36985 readers
721 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 89 points 4 days ago (5 children)

I wish government organisations would host their own Mastodon servers. Get off Twitter.

[–] nyankas@lemmy.ml 40 points 4 days ago

Germany actually does that! Quite a few government bodies are already active at https://social.bund.de/. Maybe there‘s hope that other countries will follow.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 21 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Trump actually does host his own Mastodon server. It's called "Truth". Unfortunately it doesn't federate 🤣

But yeah, pretty rough to see Obama and Biden still posting to Xitter.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Fortunately it doesn't federate

Ftfy.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Federation is a 2 way street! No federation means his users all get to live out their days in a big circlejerk.

[–] moopet@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

it's not like being exposed to other people's content would change them in any way

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why not? All the Fox and Facebook misinformation radicalized them once. Why couldn't they change again?

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Because they will create their own circlejerk in the fediverse too and people will leave them alone to do it. Instances would likely defederate from a truth social instance if it were federated. They are also in the habit of banning anyone who speaks against their side so it wouldn't do much good to try.

[–] ratten 1 points 3 days ago

No, I think it would be great if it federated. More people would come into contact with the idea of federation. I doubt most people using truth social are aware it's Mastodon. I certainly didn't know.

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago

They had to migrate to something else because it violated the AGPL

[–] moseschrute@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

I had no idea truth social was powered by mastodon. But it makes sense that maga is too dumb to build their own platform lol.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

In some countries, corporations and government are basically the same entity. Free countries distinguish between them in a meaningful sense.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 4 points 4 days ago

Even then, would rather my government contract out Mastodon hosting to a company based here in the UK than to use the American Hosted and moderated Elon tool.

[–] golli@sopuli.xyz 4 points 4 days ago

Honestly, imo they wouldn't even need to get off Twitter and other platforms completely. Just make their own mastodon instance (or something similar that they control themselves) the primary source of truth and place of interaction. They could still link and reference it on other platforms to increase visibility, but make sure that all primary information is in a freely accessible place and not beholden to unreliable entities.