this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2025
506 points (98.7% liked)

politics

25799 readers
3240 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 160 points 6 days ago (4 children)

This is what I keep saying. When our we going to We The People on this?

Kimmel didn’t even say anything about Kirk he criticized the machine trying to create a narrative.

Who he really criticized was Trump. He showed the clip of how mournful Trump was. A reporter asks how he’s doing with the death and he waves a hand dismissively saying “Im fine” and in the same breath starts waxing poetic on the ballroom he’s building.

THATS why Kimmel was suspended.

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 30 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Even his critique of the MAGA side could be applied to pretty much everyone:

MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it.

I think everyone knew there's political benefit to the shooter not being on "their side" and many people actively pointed to evidence that indicates he wasn't. Kinda didn't help that the shooter basically turned out to just be some dude with no obvious affiliation.

It just so happens that there's one political party that controls every aspect of the hill and who's been clamoring to suppress dissent that make them an obvious stand-in for the subject of the joke when anyone else coulda been seamlessly slotted in.


It's infuriating that this is how we're losing our freedom of speech. The most milquetoast, unprovoking recognition of the state of things. He didn't even call the fascist Nazi president a fascist Nazi--just described him as being like a child and that was enough.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It is so fucking bizarre because it has been a favorite American past time to hate the president. Motherfucking Trump tried to float the idea that Obama wasn't even an American citizen. That is a hundred more times disrespectful than anything that has been done to Trump.

Trump constantly talked shit about who was President. Why the fuck does he think he deserves some special kind of respect he refused to give anyone else. He is the worst kind of snowflake crybaby man child I have ever seen.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

This is how Cluster B Personality Disorders work. Narcissistic type is a fragile snowflake that creates a false reality and freaks out / throws abuse when anyone contradicts that reality. Worse, if they’re exposed for what the ly are. The difference with Trump is he has a following playing up that false reality to an entire nation.

Trumps behavior is not bizarre, it’s Cluster B doing Cluster B things, on script.

The problem is he’s been ramping up on power grabbing and this is step one of suspending the bill of rights.

[–] modus@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

That's what baffled me. I watched the episode and couldn't figure out what he said about Kirk that was so bad.