this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2025
59 points (78.6% liked)

Asklemmy

50655 readers
401 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Meta along with Ray-Ban announced new smart glasses and the YT reviewers are praising it.

For me, I don't find them particularly good and being a Meta product, it will be horrible for privacy. Also people can record others without their knowledge with these, hell no!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (3 children)

There’s open source but not video capable. The Brilliant Labs Halo glasses coming in November are more of an informational companion with a peripheral-view display rather than a field of view overlay. So it’s not what you’re looking for now, but maybe a generation or two later it’ll meet your needs.

[–] justsquigglez@leminal.space 6 points 1 week ago

That's still really cool to hear though, definitely looking forward to see where that is in a few years.

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I wonder if a 3d printable frame could be possible with the lenses and SOC produced separately. Maybe it could be paired with a phone to offload the work.

[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I think they’re pretty much all paired with a phone for a lot of the workload.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No, none of this. It doesn't matter if there are "good guys" versions. It shouldn't be a thing at all because it never goes the good way. They'll be bought out by Google or apple, and add in ads and tracking software. Or they'll get big and change core values. Remember when googles motto was like, don't be evil, or something like that? It definitely isn't that anymore. There is no scenario where this kind of tech doesn't turn bad.

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A spec that can be 3d printed and hand assembled by the user (with the exception of the lenses) could work well - hard to enshittify that.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Until it's not. It's just best to abandon this tech tree altogether.

[–] swab148@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

An open source license could solve this. If they sell out, just fork it and pick up where they left off.

[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 5 points 1 week ago

Do you own anything tech then? Not sure this mindset applies only to smart glasses.