this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2025
161 points (99.4% liked)

Asklemmy

50674 readers
332 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
Cloak@lemmy.ml
mekhos@lemmy.ml
tmpod@lemmy.pt
14specks@lemmy.ml
161
What do you think: should all government software be open source? (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 week ago by fajre@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
48 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Iโ€™ve been thinking about transparency and security in the public sector. Do you think all government software and platforms should be open source?

Some countries have already made progress in this area:

  • Estonia: digital government services with open and auditable APIs.
  • United Kingdom: several open source government projects and systems published on GitHub.
  • France and Canada: policies encouraging the use of free and open source software in public agencies.

Possible benefits:

  • Full transparency: anyone can audit the code, ensuring there is no corruption, hidden flaws, or unauthorized data collection.
  • Enhanced security: public reviews help identify vulnerabilities quickly.
  • Cost reduction: less dependency on private vendors and lower spending on proprietary licenses.
  • Flexibility and innovation: public agencies can adapt systems to their needs without relying on external solutions.

Possible challenges:

  • Maintenance and updating of complex systems.
  • Protecting sensitive data without compromising citizen privacy.
  • Political or bureaucratic resistance to opening the code.

Do you think this could be viable in the governments of your countries? How could we start making this a reality globally?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] mesamunefire@piefed.social 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The issue is that most us government software....is actually a contractor. For example, oracle/PeopleSoft is huuuuuge in government. And it will never be open source with that company.

Another huge powerhouse is Acela. Of you do local government, its probably running Acela. Should it be open source, sure! But the software itself is very contractor or SaaS based.

I wish there was more open source for the good of the people, but contractors give excellent scapegoats if something goes wrong. Its not the governments fault the system was down you see, its the contractors fault, go yell at them. If they succeed, great look at all the things we did!

[โ€“] lukecooperatus@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 week ago

The contractors would merely need to use/develop open source software if they want their cushy government contracts. Seems doable to me.