this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2025
74 points (98.7% liked)

Fediverse

1216 readers
95 users here now

Downvote are limited to members of this community

Welcome!

Can you imagine, years ago how the internet was before? We know Facebook, Twitter, Tiktok, Youtube. We knew blogger, Tumblr, Skyrock... and long before, it was the forum era as phpBB..and mail-lists.

And now with ActivityPub, we are reshaping the web, and achieving much with lots of freedom. So thank you all, and welcome 🀟😁

Our thread

Wiki

Ressources

Related communities

If you want to donate, double check on the official website and report any problem to mod team

Social network

Threadiverse

Blog

Microblog

Event

Mediaverse

Audio

Streaming/live

Book

Culture review

Picture

Short-video

Video


Image Credits :
Avatar : Wikipedia Eukombos
Banner : David Revoy licence : CC-BY-4.0

Rules

Moderation process
We all make mistakes,

If your comment is reported, and brings up a complex issue, we will reach out to you and ask you to rephrase it.

Our goal, is to create a serene space for discussion. Nothing more.

If the post isn't edited to remove hurtful language element, we will have to remove it. It would be a shame because your comment was interesting and you took some time to write it.

In case of xenophobia, racism, transphobia, homophobia or harassment, it will be a permanent ban.

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

I used to say "Welcome to Lemmy" to new joiners, but nowadays quite a few of them join Piefed instance, having a generic term is easier

You can't follow Mastodon users from Lemmy or Piefed, using "Fedivers" seems too generic

Previous post on the same topic: https://lemmy.zip/post/33451610

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] recursive_recursion@piefed.ca 26 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I use Fediverse as threads is tied to meta

[–] bigfondue@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

When I hear threadiverse I think of Mastodon and Bluesky

[–] Blaze@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Gemini is both the Google AI and the network protocol, it seems clear which one you’re referring to depending on context

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Arguably the context is very similar - it makes it seem like Threads is part of the "Threadiverse". AFAIK it's not? The fact that I don't know is rather telling.

[–] Blaze@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I, uh, don't know what you're trying to say. I was talking about support for the ActivityPub protocol.

[–] Blaze@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I was referring to this comment ( https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/21052151 )

And the word meta itself is used for meta communities on the Threadiverse which have nothing to do with Meta the company. Words existed before companies took them.

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So you didn't mean to reply to me in the first place?

[–] Blaze@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I did, I was making a comparison how comments words such as "meta" and "threads" shouldn't be owned by corporations

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Whilst I agree that they shouldn't, it's a fact that Threads exists and, as far as I know, is not part of the Threadiverse but is in an adjacent space. To the point where I personally, someone involved in the Fediverse, am not sure whether it communicates with the "Threadiverse". Mastodon does, for example.

If we were talking about a family of phones called "Threads" then that wouldn't be all that confusing, but when it's another social app then it's a mess.

[–] Pamasich@kbin.earth 1 points 2 days ago

To the point where I personally, someone involved in the Fediverse, am not sure whether it communicates with the "Threadiverse". Mastodon does, for example.

If you count Mastodon, then Threads does indeed communicate with the Threadiverse. Here on Mbin, I can find federated accounts from there, like this totally random guy which do have actual posts. So looks like everything is federating over well.

[–] Blaze@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

To the point where I personally, someone involved in the Fediverse, am not sure whether it communicates with the β€œThreadiverse”.

They do not, at this moment. The moment you see a Facebook Threads user comment here, you'll be sure everyone will be talking about this.

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago

My confusion and uncertainty was the point. It wasn't a question.

[–] julian@activitypub.space 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Is Zuck still using the term Threadiverse? If it was a one-off, then I'd write it off and take back the darn term.

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago

I've no idea, but I know Threads still exists. Beyond that I don't know what they're up to and what the state of play is in terms of Fediverse integration.

They chose well in terms of trying to poison the well.

[–] squirrel@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 4 days ago

And the word meta itself is used for meta communities on the Threadiverse which have nothing to do with Meta the company. Words existed before companies took them.

[–] Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

To us maybe, as we already know what the fediverse is. To newcomers and people who haven't really heard of it yet, it sounds like Threads and its associated software.

I've been on here for about two years, and I'm pretty sure that you were here before me. This stuff is part of our everyday language, whereas most people haven't heard of Lemmy, Piefed, or Mbin. They've all seen the ads for Threads though

[–] Blaze@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Which other word do you suggest using?

[–] Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 days ago

I have no idea. I just think that, unfortunately, threadiverse is going to be linked to Threads, whether we want it to be or not :(

[–] pseudo@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 days ago

They try to stole pour vocabulary. one more reason to keep it alive.