this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2025
669 points (95.6% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

7903 readers
235 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Nom Nom Nom...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OccamsRazer@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I see, you could actually interpret it either way.

[–] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

How do you interpret it any way other than what it says? You are making an assumption if you interpret it differently than what he clearly stated.

[–] OccamsRazer@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I read it as him saying that the shooter was unquestionably right wing, which is different than saying that the right wing is desperate to prove that it's anyone else.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The right also desperate to prove its somebody else because they want targets for political repression and kirk's death is simply not useful otherwise.

[–] OccamsRazer@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, just as there are those on the left who view the killing as deserved or somehow an acceptable outcome.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Idk how true that is. I think its more that if we're just going to have random people shooting folks at events it seems less bad if the people shot are the ones with a giant megaphone saying that the shootings should be seen as inevitable.

Its like, at least the guy that got shot had lived as millionaire for a decade and its not some kid this time

I can't point to anyone notable that couldn't be an AI or right winger sockpuppet account that actually cheered it on in the same sort of way that like republican politicians gleefully celebrated nancy pelosi's husband being attacked.