this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2025
453 points (96.9% liked)

News

32520 readers
4428 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Elon Musk has finally addressed reports that his name is included in a newly released batch of Epstein files.

Sharing a story from U.K. outlet Sky News, which ran with the simple headline “Elon Musk and Prince Andrew Named in the Latest Epstein Files Release,” the Tesla CEO fired off an enraged tweet.

“Shame on Sky News for this utterly misleading headline,” Musk wrote. “Anyone pushing this false narrative deserves complete contempt.”

“Epstein tried to get me to go to his island and I REFUSED,” Musk continued, “yet they name me even before Prince Andrew, who did visit.”

The “false narrative” in question is presumably Sky’s decision to float Musk’s name ahead of Andrew’s; the Daily Beast has reached out to Musk’s representatives for further clarification.

Musk’s name does indeed appear in the latest batch of documents released by Democrats on the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

“Reminder: Elon Musk to island Dec. 6 (is this still happening?)” reads a note found in a 2014 diary of the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The revelation comes from a fresh haul of previously unreleased material pertaining to the Epstein investigation, which has continued to dog the Trump administration.

Musk has previously said that he was invited to Epstein’s compound on Little St. James in the Virgin Islands several times, but claims he turned down the offers.

In a statement to Vanity Fair in 2019, just days after Epstein was arrested on federal sex trafficking charges, Musk confirmed that he had visited the disgraced financier’s Manhattan townhouse for about 30 minutes several years previously, but that “Epstein is obviously a creep.” He added, “He tried repeatedly to get me to visit his island. I declined.”

In an interview with the Department of Justice in August, British socialite and longtime Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently serving a 20-year prison sentence for sex trafficking, said she first met Musk in 2010 or 2011, during a multi-day stay on a Caribbean island for Google co-founder Sergey Brin’s birthday.

She also said she later saw Musk at an Oscars event, seemingly referring to a Vanity Fair Oscars party on March 2, 2014, where she and Musk were photographed together. The aspiring trillionaire has previously explained that image by saying he did not know Maxwell and that she had “photobombed” him.

Maxwell did not have any knowledge of a deeper relationship between Epstein and Musk, but believed emails between the two men were uncovered during discovery.

In June, Musk, the former head of the Department of Government Efficiency, fell out with his buddy President Donald Trump in spectacular fashion. At the height of their spat, Musk wrote in a now-deleted tweet that Trump “is in the Epstein files.” He has since retracted the statement and apologized, saying that he “went too far.”

Others named in the latest round of Epstein file disclosures include Musk’s former colleague and right-wing billionaire, Peter Thiel, and Trump’s former chief strategist, Steve Bannon.

Further documents are expected to be released as Congress prepares to vote on a bipartisan bill that would require full disclosure in the Epstein case.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] popcornpizza@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

but that “Epstein is obviously a creep.” He added, “He tried repeatedly to get me to visit his island. I declined.”

🤔 Wait, so he made the connection and didn't say anything?

Even his lies make him look bad.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

So, I'll preface this by saying that Elon is almost certainly a pedo anyway (the whole cave incident just seems 100% like projection already, before we even take the whole Epstein thing into account).

But there are also credible reasons to believe Epstein was a Mossad asset, compromising pedos in powerful positions so they could be used when Israel needs something from them. I say this because Ghislaine Maxwell's father has an interesting past and she's the one that's being accused of supplying him with the kids. Blackmail is also a famous Mossad tactic.

Anyone who knew who he was wouldn't have told on him because you could get suicided real quick that way. Or evidence of you being a pedo could surface even if you weren't one.

[–] popcornpizza@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 hours ago

I could believe it if he was a nobody, but Musk was very famous and rich already. He was being name-dropped in every show and movie, everything he did and said was plastered everywhere, and was having great publicity with "his" companies.

If he got killed after going public back then, nothing would have been gained by the Maxwells except place a spotlight on themselves.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 10 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (3 children)

I'm not a fan of musk but if his statement is true he could've just not realised the flavour of creep he was and just didn't want anything to do with his island harem, but at the time also not knowing they were kids so didn't feel alarmed enough to speak up?

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Look, he just had the chance to explain himself clearly. But he did not, even though he has years of public speaking experience. So instead, you are imagining what he could have said. That usually suggests you are getting manipulated.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

I'm not getting manipulated. I'm just playing devil's advocate

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 17 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

He donated a sizeable fraction of a billion to a guy whom he said is in the Epstein files, and the latter only after they had a falling-out. So yea, I won't really believe his words on the matter.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 5 points 15 hours ago

That's fair. I was just playing devil's advocate. It wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if he turns out he's a true diddler

[–] saimen@feddit.org 0 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

To continue playing devil's advocat: It could be he only found out about it during his DOGE activities.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Given that he first claimed Trump was in the files and then apologised, the only valid devil's advocate is "maybe he thought he had some proof but later realized it wasn't conclusive". The only other options involve either him trying to blackmail Trump on a very sensitive matter or taking it back to preserve his fortune at the face of threats by Trump both of which are ethically way worse than the first option.

If we go to the first option, lets assume this is true. His DOGE team did make many errenous claims during their lifetime which were debunked later. But then we are facing a man, whose impaired political judgement skills are proven time and time again, and yet who is trying to steer world wide politics towards his opinion by appearing at extremist right wing rallies. The net negative effect of this option is just as bad if he is going to make such grand claims on world issues based on his judgement skills.

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 5 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

He still did nothing about it until he was kicked out of the inner circle.

He didn't just learn about it, then exposed it. He learned about it, sat on the info, then released it when it felt like it would gain him something.

[–] popcornpizza@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 17 hours ago

The guy who accuses everyone of being pedos didn't realize the "obvious" creep with his own island was a pedo? 🤔 Hmmmm...

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 2 points 13 hours ago

No, no, no - just scheduling issues (between several such islands).