this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2025
271 points (98.6% liked)
Ukraine
10803 readers
423 users here now
News and discussion related to Ukraine
Community Rules
🇺🇦 Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.
🌻🤢No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
💥Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title
🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW
❗ Server Rules
- Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
- No racism or other discrimination
- No Nazis, QAnon or similar
- No porn
- No ads or spam (includes charities)
- No content against Finnish law
💳 Defense Aid 💥
💳 Humanitarian Aid ⚕️⛑️
🪖 Volunteer with the International Legionnaires
See also:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I understand headlines need to be short but I'm not comfortable with this WW2 terminology.
edit: all Ukraine subs get you downvoted into negative numbers at the slightest hint of what could be construed to be criticism against Ukraine's forces, journalists or people. I do not mean it that way. I just don't like that term because of the nazi associations I get from it, regardless of Ukraine's very justified war against Russia.
edit2: judging from your comments, for an English speaker Blitz seems to refer to any type of "lightning war", maybe even a counterattack against the Nazis, rather than something the Nazis coined if not invented. For a German speaker it's the other way round:
Simplytranslate:
Why not?
Are they jokes? Or is it flirting with real fears? And either way, why would it be bad to use familiar terms?