this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2025
240 points (80.6% liked)

Lefty Memes

6072 readers
1312 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


0.5 [Provisional Rule] Use alt text or image descriptions to allow greater accessibility


(Please take a look at our wiki page for the guidelines on how to actually write alternative text!)

We require alternative text (from now referred to as "alt text") to be added to all posts/comments containing media, such as images, animated GIFs, videos, audio files, and custom emojis.
EDIT: For files you share in the comments, a simple summary should be enough if they’re too complex.

We are committed to social equity and to reducing barriers of entry, including (digital) communication and culture. It takes each of us only a few moments to make a whole world of content (more) accessible to a bunch of folks.

When alt text is absent, a reminder will be issued. If you don't add the missing alt text within 48 hours, the post will be removed. No hard feelings.


0.5.1 Style tip about abbreviations and short forms


When writing stuff like "lol" and "iirc", it's a good idea to try and replace those with their all caps counterpart

  • ofc => OFC
  • af = AF
  • ok => OK
  • lol => LOL
  • bc => BC
  • bs => BS
  • iirc => IIRC
  • cia => CIA
  • nato => Nato (you don't spell it when talking, right?)
  • usa => USA
  • prc => PRC
  • etc.

Why? Because otherwise (AFAIK), screen readers will try to read them out as actually words instead of spelling them


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't irrationally idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 32 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Is this badly timed or intentional to fracture the not-fascists in America? Priorities, people. Don't fight your allies when you are at war with a common enemy that is about to destroy all of you.

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago (2 children)
[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 14 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

not when they're voting with trump and have said they don't want to be an opposition party, no.

[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

So what is your solution? What is the plan?

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

they've decided against the ballot, so I guess the bullet.

[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

And what will the results be? What is it you intend to achieve, short term and long term?

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

liberation for the people, and liberation for the people.

[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Can you expand in more informative terms than clever soundbites?

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Come on now dude. A link. That is shamefully lazy and nowhere as clever as you feel. Are you just another mindless drone that just happens to have latched on this flavour of radical political ideas? Could you just as well have stumbled across something else in those formative days and became a parrot of QAnon/MAGA? Since you make such strong statements, surely you are capable of explaining by yourself in your own words? Or is it all just identity and clout and memes and maybe some ChatGPT but really nothing more?

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus -1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

if you were actually interested, I would say join the db0 Anarchism channel on matrix so you could ask questions and have them answered by dozens of anarchists, as well as get recommendations for further reading beyond the AFAQ.

but we both know you're asking this in bad faith with no intention of doing more than scoffing at the idea. so no, I'm not going to waste my breath on you. the memes in this comm aren't for you, as evidenced by your need to even ask what it is we're looking for, and none of us are under any obligation to cater to your demands.

I'll spend time talking to you when shit gets bad enough you're radicalized. until then, you're an adversary and you can fuck right off.

[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Excuses, excuses it is then. Another useful idiot for the fascists to fraction opposition while they take over. Think that you want about me when ICE got you dude.

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus -3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

lol yeah that's what I thought, collaborator scum. let the door hit your unwashed liberal ass on the way out.

[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Collaborator of what? Are you just putting words together by random?

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus -2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

oh no, that was a farewell. you're dismissed, I have no further use for you.

[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Seriously, collaborator of what? Because I don't want the fascists to take over the country where you seemingly live? Do you not value your own words at all? Is it all about having a boner from snappy oneliners on social media? Is that all you are dude?

[–] SadSadSatellite@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Yeah I bet we'd be in exactly the same position right now if non fascist infighting hadn't handed republicans the house, senate, and presidency.

I'm sure kamala would have cut funding to everything useful and given executive power to elon musk and sold our national parks to the oil companies and built a private gestapo and legalized stopping brown people for being brown and put massive tariffs on everything and given the CDC to an evil dipshit and I'm sure a blue majority senate and house would have approved all of that.

Good thing everyone screaming about the genocide made so many people lose hope or it might still be going on.

Wait, trump did end the palastinian conflict, right?

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

You cannot blame voters for a reactions they had to a political party's actions, especially when that action was to aid a genocidal campaign.

Although OP is being extreme by saying they are the same, so are you when you try to explain away the fucking shit show last election.

They could have told Israel to pound sand, instead they screwed us over. Stop scapegoating bro, the Democrats gave him the win when they started throwing punches at their own base.

[–] SadSadSatellite@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I understand that the dems are dogshit and couldn't get a rally behind them. But the fascists needed to be wiped out completely. We could have rallied against the rebublicans, and had more time to change the parties in power, but now we won't be likely to get the chance to oust them ever again. We have been shown with every election for the last half a century that anytime conservatives get power, they make it harder to take away, and make the world a worse place.

I don't blame the voters, but I'm unhappy with all the people who thought this was the time to try to make a point to the dems by convincing others they shouldn't vote against fascism. They didn't try it when it was romney. They didn't try it when it was bush and Carey, they decided the correct time to sow infighting was an actual real fascist with a team of sycophants who want to make him a king.

And most who decided they didn't want to support the dems probably didn't go to the polls at all, since it's far too common for dipshit Americans to thinknonly the presidential campaign matters, so now not only is the president a king, but the down ballot positions support him as well.

The christofascists were always going to vote en mass for one side, as they always have. We were supposed to try and stop them. Now antifa is a terrorist group. People are being arrested for wearing free palastine shirts. Being queer is considered a mental illness. Wearing a mask at a protest is a crime. The mass surveillance that never should have started in the first place is not only strengthened, it's data is for sale.

Everything just got a lot worse, and changing it just got a lot harder.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Hard to disagree with anything you just said.

To put it succinctly, I see the voters as having gotten roped into doing something stupid because of the pure horror of the situation. The dems had a much better idea of the consequences and also helped build the situation. I also think that while not voting was the wrong move to make, it's also understandable. What the Democrats did was a bad move but it also makes no sense and was overall reprehensible behavior.

Everybody sucks type of situation but some more than others.

More importantly, I also think the old guard needs to be ousted from the party and that won't happen if they have a convenient scapegoat.

I get the frustration aimed at voters though.

[–] NewDark 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Can you answer two questions for me.

What is the purpose of having a democracy?

Is it ever morally correct to affirmatively vote for a genocide?

[–] SadSadSatellite@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago (2 children)
  1. We haven't been a democracy since we allowed companies to buy politicians. We've had two sides to choose from, kind of, which are: 'hardly does anything' and 'actively makes everything worse for everyone immediately'.

  2. Genocide wasn't on the ballot. Anyone who thought trump would stop it was wrong, as anyone who thought about it for a second had been telling them.

So now that those are out of the way, how does that idealistic high horse help every person whose life is now actively worse now?

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

We haven’t been a democracy since we allowed companies to buy politicians.

so why are you trying to get people to engage in a sham, then? are you working with the fascists to try and dampen direct action?

Direct action does not mean "don't also vote to make it harder for the fascists." Only two options were valid for the majority of election positions. We could have bought more time to fill local positions with third parties and progressives, but instead we're building concentration camps and cutting any progress we've made in the last 20 years.

[–] NewDark 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
  1. You're then caputulating to the rules in an unjust society. If we don't have a democracy in which we can extract concessions and enact the will of the people, why are you so bent about this "democratic" vote.

  2. Almost correct. Third parties exist, and not voting exists. The democrats failed to have a platform that made people want to vote for them. You hold the position that the democrats can't fail, they can only be failed. Blaming voters doesn't work.

Things aren't better now. They've been steadily getting worse under every administration. Electoralist liberal brain rot is keeping your mind in this neat little box where you can't imagine a different world outside of dogshit and worse dogshit.

[–] SadSadSatellite@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Let's say everyone who isn't Maga voted third party. What does the electoral college do?

[–] NewDark 2 points 4 hours ago

Everyone? Third party wins in a landslide. The plurality of eligible voters don't vote. If you mean magically all democrats and a third party got the votes last time, the same outcome as this election.

People chose the couch, they didn't choose Trump. Both parties lost voters since last election, democrats just lost many more.

But you're still in this electoralist mindset in a system that is inherently undemocratic. You're missing the forest for the trees.

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Wait, trump did end the palastinian conflict, right?

wait, did kamala or biden say they didn't support Israel?

[–] SadSadSatellite@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

If only two candidates had the possibility of winning, and neither of them were going to change that particular issue, then it held no bearing on the election. Pretending that it could be changed and sowing apathy in voters gave full power to the fascists.

So, is the world a better place now? Or is everyone worse off than we could have been while the genocide is still happening regardless?

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

"if I think nothing can be changed, why bother?"

That's exactly what I'm saying. There are so many other issues to consider, but they were disregarded because of one issue that has not changed.

It's still happening, and now we're also building concentration camps.

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago

Yes, I am. Are you riding a high tank in the nude? Would you mind stepping down and talk about it?