this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2025
997 points (98.7% liked)

Funny

11860 readers
2059 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] uservoid1@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Win ME is the 98 image but the rock is on the smaller branch

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

When they combined CE, ME and NT now that was a solid product.

[–] uservoid1@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

ME was crap, NT was a workhorse (as long as you didn't try to install new stuff too often) and CE... was a wird alien no one know exactly what to do with it (almost had the potential but Microsoft blew it as usual). Win2K was a fine rather stable beast.

CE… was a wird alien no one know exactly what to do with it

Windows CE had the portable device market absolutely locked down circa 2003 -- not including Blackberry which had all the smartphone market, but CE had everything else. And then MS just said "fuck this market completely" and gave up.

My favorite thing about CE was that Microsoft unironically referred to it as "WinCE". It just doesn't get better than that.

[–] RedSnt@feddit.dk 3 points 2 days ago

I think about that joke all the time, good ol' CEMENT

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Win ME worked fine. I’m pretty sure I applied the XP theme and never noticed a difference.

[–] uservoid1@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

ME was crashing by the phases of the moon or if you hit the keyboard too fast.

Had ME on my home computer. I could had installed 98 but thought ME was newer than 98 so must be better (wrong). But nothing was lost when crashed, you reboot and could start over in no time.