I understand that the west has ridiculously high levels of propaganda against the DPRK but how do Communists argue with the fact that there is clearly some kind of family line to the leader role? (hexbear.net)

submitted 1 year ago by hotwarioinyourarea@hexbear.net to c/communism101@lemmygrad.ml

108 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Shouldn't the role be "advertised" to other people as well? Why is it following the Kim family line when that seems completely against ML thought?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah it's basically "What if the Kennedys had seen the US through a the complete destruction by bomb and rebuilding of the country"

[-] SovereignState@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 1 year ago

I'd vote for em (in this hypothetical) 🤷‍♂️

I'd prolly also lambast anyone who decided they weren't worth voting for as foolish. Much like term limit scaremongering, a lot of the sealioning about the Kim "dynasty" is predicated on a rather infantile understanding of democracy. Not that OP did or is doing this by asking in good faith.

[-] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

I’d vote for the bomb

this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023

52 points (84.2% liked)

Communism101

1338 readers

1 users here now

This is a community for those who are new to or unfamiliar with communist, socialist or simply leftist philosophy. Ask basic questions here and learn about what we stand for!

Rules:

Keep things SFW!
Keep posts and comments civil.
Don't attack someone for not knowing "enough" about communism or leftism.
Civil discussion and debate is welcome, trolling and hate speech is not.
No racism, sexism, homophobia, inciting crime/violence, etc.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

redjoker@lemmygrad.ml

FPGA@lemmygrad.ml