this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2025
83 points (98.8% liked)

Videos

167 readers
22 users here now

Share

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 

1 sure looks like him activating a shock collar because he doesn't want her allowed to do anything other than sit in one designated spot while he's doing his stream

2 is self-explanatory

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] slowcakes@programming.dev 18 points 5 days ago (3 children)

You call this animal abuse, the guy barely gets angry, and even if he did get angry it doesn't mean jack shit about how some one treats their pet. You call this animal abuse, the guy isn't even yelling at his dog, it doesn't mean anything.

For your own health, you should probably ask yourself why you think he is abusing his pet, based on the evidence you shared? Because there is no way that you can tell by the two clips you shared that he is, in NO WAY. But here you are sharing this as evidence. Either you are stupid as fuck or you are being manipulated by this whole streamer drama shit.

Stop watching internet influencers, they are all boring as fuck and stupid as fuck, but I guess stupid attracts stupid.

[–] CXORA@aussie.zone 11 points 5 days ago (2 children)

You can be abusive without being angry or yelling... your refutation makes no sense.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 11 points 5 days ago

Dogs are notoriously insecure about people criticizing their career achievements for example

[–] slowcakes@programming.dev 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yap yap yap, annoying bro, who did say anything otherwise. Do I have to state everything that is considered abusive and what is not?

Stop playing smart.

[–] CXORA@aussie.zone 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You call this animal abuse, the guy barely gets angry, and even if he did get angry it doesn't mean jack shit about how some one treats their pet. You call this animal abuse, the guy isn't even yelling at his dog, it doesn't mean anything.

[–] slowcakes@programming.dev 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yes and what else? You do understand that my comment is in the context of the video?

[–] CXORA@aussie.zone 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] slowcakes@programming.dev 1 points 4 days ago

Jesus Christ, for all I know he might be feeding his dog shit.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 6 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Stop watching internet influencers, they are all boring as fuck and stupid as fuck, but I guess stupid attracts stupid.

Way ahead of you. It is remarkable how universally the Hasan stans have all started assuming that I watch some kind of "counter-Hasan" and that's where all this is coming from. Like I said, I saw it on reddit when it went to the top of /r/all for a while.

You call this animal abuse, the guy isn’t even yelling at his dog, it doesn’t mean anything.

See, this is more of what I'm talking about when I say that the stans are doing absolutely 0 to change my mind about this: I think it's pretty clear that he shocked the dog with a collar on stream. You might disagree with that, and fine, you can tell me why you think so (my guess is it will include the phrase "dew claw.") But just pretending that all of a sudden we're talking about him "barely yelling at her" and that's the issue, is just going to convince me that you're not really aware of what we're talking about. And that kind of lack of reading comprehension doesn't really bode well for your ability to make sense of things that are more complex than "what do the words I literally just read say, and what does the person who wrote them think happened and what are they irritated about."

[–] Orygin@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago

started assuming that I watch some kind of "counter-Hasan" and that's where all this is coming from.

It's pretty clear you do, or you frequent places that have a cult-like hate for Hasan. Any reasonable and neutral viewer would see this is a nothing burger. Or at least warrants caution before accusing and slandering someone.

[–] slowcakes@programming.dev 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You're delusional, I'm not even going to make an effort trying to understand what you are trying to say. The fucking thing stops when you say "you think", that is the whole point, you don't know, you think.

And you just want to start a pitchfork mob, about something "you think". You Are A Dangerous Idiot.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Sweet

Keep talking, I just crossposted the new thing with images of the sockets for the shock collar's prongs to !youtubedrama@reddthat.com to try to get that community back going again. I will probably calm down with the crossposts after this, three is enough, but it was a decent amount of fun just doing one crosspost every time one of the Hasan stans said something cult-y to me about it and it has resulted in a pretty quick succession of crossposts at this point lol.

[–] slowcakes@programming.dev 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Jesus, you still have no evidence of it, it doesnt matter if if he owns a shock collar or not. There is no way for you to know if he shocked his dog or not. And to be frank, shock collar doesn't indicate animal abuse. I had a uncle who had to use a shock collar because his puppy wouldn't stop barking and the neighbors got kinda tired of hearing his dog bark all day all night, which triggered when the dog was about to bark. And it doesn't even feel like a "shock", it feels like you are being poked or touched.

You know that animal abuse is illegal? And do you think that selling shock collars, which you consider animal abuse, would then be legal?

Can we argue that he is a bad dog owner - yeah, but is he abusing his dog, who the fuck knows, the fucking shit you guys share is insane.

[–] audaxdreik@pawb.social 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I think you need to evaluate what "evidence" is and see that there is none of it in this clip. Like none. 0. Only vague inferences from an extremely loose correlation of subtle actions. You trying to sell this as "incontrovertible" proof is the most disingenuous thing I've seen.

If you are not a parasocial “counter-Hasan” activist you are being an extremely useful idiot to their ends right now. I would delete this whole post out of sheer embarrassment if I were you and then evaluate my life choices on spreading internet drama that you, by your own admission, are not even involved or invested in.

Disgusting and shameful.

EDIT: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZU2qy3CRk0. FUCKING EMBARRASSING. DELETE THIS.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 4 points 5 days ago (3 children)

"I give Kaya the place command as I usually do" He did not do that, he ranted about Israel for a while and then when she dared to step off the platform he said, "Kaya! Please!" Also "Go ba--" and "Stop!"

Like the "she clipped herself" thing, this to me at least is a massive red flag. It's hard to tell what's true, you kind of walk into a situation and you're not sure what to think and it's all conflicting claims. But one of the early things you can pick out is someone who lies about something recent that is instantly verifiable, and does it confidently and sort of automatically. It doesn't mean they're on the wrong side of everything, but it's a massive warning sign, and then if later on they wind up wanting you to take their word for things you know how much weight to give it.

You trying to sell this as “incontrovertible” proof

Pretty sure I never did that, search for "You might disagree with that, and fine"

I have more to say, but not tonight, it is enough for one day good lord. Whenever I get up the gumption to say more I will tag you I guess.

FUCKING EMBARRASSING. DELETE THIS.

No I don't think that I will

[–] BeliefPropagator@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Just wanted to chime in and thank you for taking the time replying to these selectively blind & deflecting individuals and trying to get them off their wild wild ride. I don't have the energy to argue with them myself, but it's truly maddening how they're ignoring what's right in front of them - ignoring what a PoS this influencer is, is playing right into right-wing people's hands.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 3 points 5 days ago

Ha, thank you. Just the fact that it involves someone being careless and mean to his dog got me pretty riled up about it tbh.

I see that they've now progressed from "Why do you care SO MUCH about and have a parasocial attachment to this streamer, that's weird" and into "Why are you even spending SO MUCH time and energy posting about this topic, how dare you put comments on this internet site, that is unhealthy." I feel like the sudden shift away from actually talking about the subject matter means I'm winning lol.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Okay, I got my gumption, here's what more I have to say:

https://piefed.social/post/1354201

You can thank @renlinwood@lemmy.blahaj.zone for irritating me to the point that I decided to take some time with a detailed response

[–] RenLinwood@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 days ago

Lol definitely not beating the "obsessed with Hasan" allegations anytime soon, still no evidence still no credibility, consider seeking professional help

[–] RenLinwood@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 days ago

Lol you're losing

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

You can still watch influencers, just don't watch the ones pushing pointless junk you don't need. Alec from Technology Connections is an example of a good influencer you should let yourself be influenced by. He even hates the word "influencer"!