this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2025
234 points (99.6% liked)

Fuck AI

4341 readers
1198 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So the research is out and these LLMs will always be vunerable to poisoned data. That means it will always be worth out time and effort to poison these models and they will never be reliable.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 47 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

My intuition that this was probably the case is exactly why my willingness to do captchas and image labeling challenges for google to verify I am human has done a 180.

I love "helping" when I can now!

When they ask me to label a bicycle or stairs I get real creative... well mostly not but enough of the time I do... oh well silly me what is important is I still pass the test!

[–] DoGeeseSeeGod@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Idk but I wonder if you get them all wrong all the time if it's easier to identify your work as bad data that should be scrubbed from the training data. Would a better strategy be to get most right and some wrong so you appear as normal user

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 week ago

That is precisely my philosophy

[–] ragas@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

Most people seem to just half-brain the challenges anyway. So on images where its easy to confuse something, the tests will often refuse you unless you put in the wrong answer, just like everybody else.

[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 week ago

nah they're probably past that stage already. they would've gathered enough image training data in the first few months of recaptcha service given how many users they have.