Fuck AI

4341 readers

1198 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

VerbFlow@lemmy.world

MrMcGasion@lemmy.world

TootSweet@lemmy.world

BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world

cynar@lemmy.world

drmeanfeel@lemmy.world

pavnilschanda@lemmy.world

CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world

WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world

Communist@lemmy.ml

eatCasserole@lemmy.world

SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world

NutWrench@lemmy.world

Soup@lemmy.cafe

iAvicenna@lemmy.world

Tinks@lemmy.world

wizblizz@lemmy.world

corus_kt@lemmy.world

Prandom_returns@lemm.ee

JimSamtanko@lemm.ee

TrickDacy@lemmy.world

TheFriar@lemm.ee

ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com

HawlSera@lemm.ee

andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works

MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works

33550336@lemmy.world

Nougat@fedia.io

Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world

Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world

Quill7513@slrpnk.net

glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz

e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de

ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social

234

Great news! A small number of samples can poison LLMs of any size (www.anthropic.com)

submitted 1 week ago by Auth@lemmy.world to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

So the research is out and these LLMs will always be vunerable to poisoned data. That means it will always be worth out time and effort to poison these models and they will never be reliable.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] DoGeeseSeeGod@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Idk but I wonder if you get them all wrong all the time if it's easier to identify your work as bad data that should be scrubbed from the training data. Would a better strategy be to get most right and some wrong so you appear as normal user

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 week ago

That is precisely my philosophy