this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2025
276 points (97.9% liked)

memes

17730 readers
2586 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] comador@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Oops, something went wrong.

Rolling back updates...

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I mean, that's the preferable way should OS should handle a borked update, it sure beats just bricking the computer.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Beating turning the computer into a brick does not make it "the preferable way" to do it.

[–] Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Update fails, OS rolls back failed changes. What would you prefer it to do?

[–] Kanda@reddthat.com 1 points 5 days ago

Boot into terminal and leave you staring at an empty prompt

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 days ago

So in the event of a failed update, what would be the preferable way to handle it then? I think automatically rolling back to a functional state before the update is pretty optimal.

force shuts down computer to break windows

Install linux now.