this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2025
140 points (92.7% liked)

news

182 readers
756 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago (3 children)

she's not wrong.

around 30% of Americans refused or failed to vote in the 2024 election. had they voted, we would probably be seeing Trump and his gaggle of shitbirds thrown in jail.

"oh Israel!" stfu. nobody actually believes that bullshit anymore. it's clearly been worse under Trump, fuckbrains.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Roughly speaking, the quality of a politician is ranked on their ability to govern, and on their ability to get votes. One or the other isn't good enough, it has to be both. In Kamala's case she was marginally better than Trump in one, and marginally worse in the other. Democrats must do much better in both.

As for Israel, there is no reason whatsoever to think it would be any better under Harris. Biden was an ideological Zionist who was never going to put real pressure on Israel. Every indication was that Harris would be more of the same. Trump, through no ideology other than serving his own ego, might have actually done better than either of them ever would have.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world -5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

95% of Congress is supports israeli. and the 5% that doesn't is too out there to ever be a popular candidate for the presidency.

but moral purists want to bang on about gaza as if it's some critical issue

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

A majority of American voters want the US to stop sending any support, military or otherwise, to Israel. Among Democratic voters that rises to 75%. I'm sorry that opposing genocide is too puritanical for your tastes, but you are completely out of touch with what is or isn't "popular".

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

cool, the stat i just looked up from a week ago says only 1/3 of americans disagree with military aid to israeli. and that's from pew research. 1/3 don't know, and the other 1/3 think we should support them more.

but keep making up your own facts I guess?

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Mine come from a Quinnipiac poll. No matter what polling you use though, there is a pretty remarkable shift against Israel every time they do another poll. Nobody would have predicted that 1/3 a couple years ago.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (3 children)

"oh Israel!" stfu. nobody actually believes that bullshit

100% I highly doubt the motives of these people, makes me think they have some other agenda going on. Makes no sense they'd prefer this shit over Harris.

[–] itsprobablyfine@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's not always a strictly logical choice for people. I can totally see how someone with family there would be unable to vote for either candidate. Yes, I was personally able to see my vote as anti trump, but if things were similar under a harris presidency I'd spend my whole life having to reconcile the fact that I did indeed vote for genocide (even if it was justified in my mind at the time). Not everyone wants to do that. And if I can see that problem I don't understand how professional politicians can't. People weren't saying 'dont vote for her cause genocide' they were saying 'some people won't vote for her cause genocide, maybe enough to swing the thing' - and they were right. I don't know why we're attacking them again and again when they were clearly right.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world -2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I get your point, but I'm strictly talking about people on this website whom I probably wrongly assume are more literate about politics and can see right through Trump based on the trends of thought on Lemmy. You can't tell me that a platform devoted to USA politics that vehemently criticizes his hypocrisy and lies doesn't realize he's talking out of both sides of his mouth while doing exactly what Biden would've done, but worse.

It seems awfully convenient to US enemies that people on online forums would prefer genocide with their destructive fascism rather than plain old genocide, while actively playing down both under this administration. This shit makes no sense.

[–] III@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Bots, troll farm employees and the truly gullible appreciate you respecting them enough to call them people.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago

"people who care about genocide aren't even human"

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

BlueMAGA loyalists do not care about mass genocide, so they can't imagine anyone who does could actually be sincere. Pure projection.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world -3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ah, because there's no genocide happening right now. Right. Also, I'm not American so miss me with your pointless partisan rhetoric. Keep defending pedophiles and the destruction of the US, though. You saved Palestine!

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)