this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2025
858 points (98.6% liked)
Technology
76278 readers
4208 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Didn't Japan rule that AI was fine to infringe copyright to train? Why are they complaining now?
The argument for training an AI on copyright materials is different than the argument for allowing it to generate and distribute copyright infringing materials.
I guess that cost a few dinners and holidays, maybe even some fancy tech stuff. But probably took them to some conference, where they showcased "what AI will be capable in just a few years, only if they could train it on copyrighted material".
its okay if they did it, but not okay if a outsider does it.-japan
Japan didn't think the face eating leopards would eat their face.