293
submitted 1 year ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

A self-styled dating coach and influencer from South Jersey blamed his pursuit of social media fame for the role he played in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol as he was sentenced to four years in federal prison Friday.

Patrick Stedman, 35, of Haddonfield, apologized for his actions that day, his livestream videos of the assault — in which he referred to members of Congress as “f— rats” and accused them of committing treason — as efforts to “look brave on Twitter.”

“Unfortunately, social media tends to reward obnoxious behavior,” he wrote in a letter to the judge. “I was a fool, and like all fools I have suffered the consequences of my myopia.”

But as she weighed Stedman’s fate, U.S. District Judge Beryl A. Howell expressed even greater concern that his social media following has only grown in the years since he was charged in connection with the riot.

Stedman, a University of Pennsylvania graduate who bills himself online as a “sex and relationship strategist” and expert in “female psychology,” had roughly 26,000 followers when he joined the mob of angry supporters of former President Donald Trump two years ago.

His follower count on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, has nearly doubled since then and he’s raised more than $100,000 through an online crowdfunding campaign to pay for his legal defense.

“Basically, they’re making money from their attack on the Capitol,” Howell said, referencing the fundraising efforts by Stedman and others. “It’s unseemly.”

Stedman’s sentence came three months after a federal jury found him guilty on one felony count of obstructing an official proceeding of Congress as well as related misdemeanors. He is among 23 New Jersey residents convicted of playing a role in the riot, which injured scores of officers, caused millions in damage and threatened the peaceful transfer of presidential power.

Prosecutors alleged Stedman spent more than 45 minutes inside the Capitol building — shouting at police, snapping selfies and documenting much of it for the thousands who followed his social media accounts.

In the days before, Stedman had urged them to join him in Washington on Jan. 6.

“Will eventually be a national holiday akin to the 4th of July,” he wrote in a post on Twitter. “You will want to tell your grandchildren you were there.”

Later, he tweeted: “This is the Second American Revolution.”

His efforts to drum up interest drew at least 11 of Stedman’s online followers to Washington that day, Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian Morgan said. Two of them joined Stedman — wearing a gaudy Christmas sweater emblazoned with Trump’s face and the slogan “Make X-mas Great Again” — in the mob that assaulted the Capitol building.

“Storming the Capitol! … It’s our f— house!” he shouted in one video as they approached from the West Lawn. He later claimed in a text that he was among the “first wave” of rioters who “broke down the doors.”

Stedman tweeted videos of himself sitting in then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office, as outside rioters brawled with police, tear gas wafted through the marbled hallways and terrified members of Congress were evacuated from the House floor.

He later joined a mob that attempted to break down the door to the House chamber — an act of aggression that led Capitol police to shoot one member of the mob, Ashli Babbitt.

When Stedman learned of Babbitt’s death, he recorded video of himself confronting police, shouting: “You’re going to shoot your own people, you ... f— scum! You killed one of us. You’re done.”

And once police finally forced him out of the building, he paused on the Capitol steps to film himself once again. He boasted that he’d forced the “rats [to] scurry under the tunnels” in fear.

“Stedman … was part of a massive riot that almost succeeded in preventing the certification vote from being carried out, frustrating the peaceful transition of presidential power and throwing the United States into a Constitutional crisis,” Morgan wrote in court filings in advance of sentencing.

For his part, Stedman said nothing as prosecutors read out his litany of offenses, sitting stone-faced next to his attorney, Rocco C. Cipparone Jr., and opting not to address the judge in court but only in the letter he’d submitted in advance.

At trial, he’d maintained he was merely exercising his right to peacefully protest and said when he called on Twitter for “revolution,” he meant a political uprising akin to the civil rights movement of the 1960s.

Howell, on Friday, called that comparison “offensive” and questioned Stedman’s continued social media popularity.

He amassed his moderately sizable online following by casting himself as a pickup artist and trafficking in a steady mix of misogyny, COVID denialism and QAnon conspiracy theories.

His daily “sex and female psychology” newsletter promises to answer once and for all what women “really want from men” and offers relationship coaching classes that promised to unlock the mysteries of “well-executed online dating exchanges” at $500 a session — a business that’s proven surprisingly lucrative, bringing in more than $17,000 a month, according to Cipparone.

And Stedman’s post-Jan. 6 online fundraising pitch on the Christian crowdfunding site GiveSendGo — in which he claimed his prosecution was “an attack on Biden’s political opponents,” blamed bitter former classmates for turning him in, and bemoaned the fact that he and his father were kicked out of their wine club after his arrest — has drawn more than $100,000 in donations, the lawyer said.

Howell appeared baffled by that clout as she announced his sentence Friday. In addition to the prison term, she ordered Stedman to pay $22,000 in fines and restitution and serve three years’ probation upon his release from prison.

“It is one of the ironies of these Jan. 6 cases that people get more popular,” she said. “I can only hope that you use that platform not to sow more disinformation and division in this country. I can only urge you to puncture that disinformation.”

Within an hour of that remark, Stedman was back on X, soliciting more donations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

He amassed his moderately sizable online following by casting himself as a pickup artist and trafficking in a steady mix of misogyny, COVID denialism and QAnon conspiracy theories. His daily “sex and female psychology” newsletter promises to answer once and for all what women “really want from men” and offers relationship coaching classes that promised to unlock the mysteries of “well-executed online dating exchanges” at $500 a session — a business that’s proven surprisingly lucrative, bringing in more than $17,000 a month, according to Cipparone.

Oh no… such a shame this guy ended up behind bars

[-] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

You know what women really want from men? A non-asshole, genuine, caring dude. I'll take my $500 now.

I suspect his what women really want from men newsletter was actually how to manipulate women. Just a guess though...

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

It’s just exploiting incels and stealing their money tbh

[-] moosepuggle@startrek.website 10 points 1 year ago

Am woman, can confirm that I want a non-asshole, genuine, caring dude. I’m lucky I found one. Funny/sad how these incels don’t just ask WOMEN what we want (like we don’t know?), they ask other men. These incels need to lurk in women’s online spaces for a few months, it’s free and more representative of women than the bs from spewing from these pickup fartists

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

They think women have simple clockwork brains that can be tricked with the right combination of tactics, resulting in sex.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I’m in the wrong business.

this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
293 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2320 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS