282
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Lyft is introducing a new feature that lets women and non-binary riders choose a preference to match with drivers of the same gender.

The ride-hailing company said it was a “highly requested feature” in a blog post Tuesday, saying the new feature allows women and non-binary people to “feel that much more confident” in using Lyft and also hopefully encourage more women to sign up to be drivers to access its “flexible earning opportunities.”

The service, called “Women+ Connect,” is rolling out in the coming months. Riders can turn on the option in the Lyft app, however the company warns that it’s not a guarantee that they’ll be matched with a women or non-binary person if one of those people aren’t nearby. Both the riders and drivers will need to opt-in to the feature for it work and riders must chose a gender for it to work.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago

What would stop me, a man, from claiming this status and requesting female drivers? While this policy was undoubtably made with good intentions, it is ripe for abuse.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Well you see, most people aren't assholes.

[-] moog@lemm.ee 29 points 1 year ago

assholes are the only reason this feature exists

[-] darkevilmac@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 year ago

Yes but the assholes are the ones that tend to take advantage of things like this.

[-] loutr@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

A looot of rules only exist because of a couple assholes ruining it for everybody.

[-] jedi_hamster@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago
[-] yata@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Not at all, you just notice the assholes much easier than non-assholes.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It sounds like you need better friends.

Or there's that old saying, if everywhere you go smells like shit, check your shoes.

[-] elax102@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

In that scenario, I would guess when the driver sees you they wouldn't let you in the car.

[-] moog@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

that would work for women but enbies can look like anyone

[-] Dontfearthereaper123@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

What abt trans women too actually. U couldn't discriminate against a trans person just because they don't pass.

[-] huginn@feddit.it 1 points 1 year ago

Drivers tend not to be the ones sexually assaulted.

[-] knobbysideup@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

How is a man asking for a woman driver abuse? Maybe I really fucking hate having to ride with dudebro cabbies and having to humor them with their inane conversations and would prefer a woman driver.

[-] johnyrocket@feddit.ch 4 points 1 year ago

If the man proceeds to abuse the woman I would say we have a problem.

[-] AnonTwo@kbin.social -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wouldn't that make you extra liable for getting sued, because on top of whatever the driver claims you did, you also specifically chose the option you shouldn't have chosen?

Like it's basically adding an extra layer of "This guy was clearly a bad actor"

this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
282 points (88.5% liked)

News

23265 readers
3543 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS