194
Halving reliance on meat and dairy could cut land-use emissions ‘by 31%’
(www.carbonbrief.org)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
194 points (92.2% liked)
Green - An environmentalist community
5234 readers
2 users here now
This is the place to discuss environmentalism, preservation, direct action and anything related to it!
RULES:
1- Remember the human
2- Link posts should come from a reputable source
3- All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith
Related communities:
- /c/collapse
- /c/antreefa
- /c/gardening
- /c/eco_socialism@lemmygrad.ml
- /c/biology
- /c/criseciv
- /c/eco
- /c/environment@beehaw.org
- SLRPNK
Unofficial Chat rooms:
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Both things can be true at the same time.
Billionaires / the 1% / whatever category of rich assholes you choose obviously use much more resources than "the common man". Still, if we, as humanity, do not change how and what we consume, cutting what the rich use would not even remotely be enough.
When i have more than one option and limited resources I like to prioritize things so I will get the most 'bang for my buck'.
If changing our diets can help 1% but eliminating infrastructure will help 40% then you can fuck off about my diet I don't care that it might 'also help' my abilities and resources are limited and I am going to direct what I have at the biggest result. Does that make sense?
Penny wise, pound foolish is the old aphorism that applies here. It doesn't matter if the whole species eats like good little boys and girls if the 1% and the militaries they control are hellbent on burning fossil fuels for their pleasure and gain until we all cook.
One is feeding people. The other is just pollution. The last thing you should mess with is people's food.