Btrfs is a great filesystem for proxmox in raid 1. Stop telling people not to use it (lemmy.zip)

submitted 1 year ago by possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip to c/homelab@lemmy.ml

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Btrfs gets a bad rap sometimes but I have been using it for years and it works very well. It is able to take failing hardware and power outages and still has good performance.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago

What are the alternatives to it? NTFS? EXT4? ExFAT? FAT32??

[-] sxan@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago

xfs. ext4 doesn't have a comparable feature set, and nobody is going to use those others as their main filesystems on Linux. bcachefs will be a contender, once it's included in the kernel, or if you're the sort who compiles their own kernels.

[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The only file-system that is somewhat comparable to btrfs is OpenZFS. Xfs isn't.

[-] sxan@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, zfs is what I meant. Or yfs, as in "Y-use anything but btr-FS?"

[-] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

Seems like zfs or btrfs?
At least I usually read about storage file system usually being ZFS by default.

[-] jelloeater85@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

ZFS has been around for a long time. Rock solid w RAID. See FreeNAS. ZFS was orig on BSD but AFAIK got ported to Linux a while back.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

It now TrueNAS and both freebsd and Linux use the same implementation (openzfs)

this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023

21 points (81.8% liked)

homelab

6584 readers

1 users here now

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

CMonster@lemmy.ml